BoyWiki:Agora/19 November 2015: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
→BoyWiki for boys?: credibility issue |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Has anyone made any efforts to make at least parts of BoyWiki be designed to meet the needs and requirements of actual boys, as in children, and on their terms? __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC) | Has anyone made any efforts to make at least parts of BoyWiki be designed to meet the needs and requirements of actual boys, as in children, and on their terms? __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
: I am not sure what you have in mind and remember that anything that remotely can be called "grooming" is illegal, esp. in the UK. Keep in mind that we are limited on what we can do under the BL banner.--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 19:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC) | : I am not sure what you have in mind and remember that anything that remotely can be called "grooming" is illegal, esp. in the UK. Keep in mind that we are limited on what we can do under the BL banner.--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 19:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::What about those boys associated with NAMBLA? I mean, aren't there ANY young people in this community/movement? Because if that's the case, then all claims of wanting to represent the boys' side in this becomes kinda moot, as in self-serving wishful thinking… __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 19:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:32, 19 November 2015
Agora/19 November 2015
BoyWiki for boys?
Has anyone made any efforts to make at least parts of BoyWiki be designed to meet the needs and requirements of actual boys, as in children, and on their terms? __meco (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you have in mind and remember that anything that remotely can be called "grooming" is illegal, esp. in the UK. Keep in mind that we are limited on what we can do under the BL banner.--Etenne (talk) 19:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- What about those boys associated with NAMBLA? I mean, aren't there ANY young people in this community/movement? Because if that's the case, then all claims of wanting to represent the boys' side in this becomes kinda moot, as in self-serving wishful thinking… __meco (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
