Talk:Censorship: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Eskimo (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Eskimo (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Thank you for your input User4, I did not explain myself properly, sorry about the misunderstanding.
Thank you for your input User4, I did not explain myself properly, sorry about the misunderstanding.


The text wasn't linkt to the outside Internet URL, the text was linking to an internal Boywiki page called "Slashdot"
The text wasn't linking to the outside Internet URL, the text was linking to an internal Boywiki page called "Slashdot"
using the tags [[]]  
using the tags [[]]  


I erased it because I don't think it made any sense for Boywiki to have a section about Slashdot and I don't think
I erased it because I don't think it made any sense for Boywiki to have a page about Slashdot and I don't think
anybody is going to create that. --[[User:Eskimo|Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo|talk]]) 01:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
anybody is going to create that. --[[User:Eskimo|Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo|talk]]) 01:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 22:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 22:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:57, 19 March 2016

Slashdot does exist. How about if the link is put back?

https://slashdot.org/

Thank you for your input User4, I did not explain myself properly, sorry about the misunderstanding.

The text wasn't linking to the outside Internet URL, the text was linking to an internal Boywiki page called "Slashdot" using the tags [[]]

I erased it because I don't think it made any sense for Boywiki to have a page about Slashdot and I don't think anybody is going to create that. --Eskimo (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

User4 (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)