(Boylove News Articles) - DEAD END: The International Megan's Law's Assault on Everyone's Freedom of Travel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
PART I: | PART I: | ||
Introduction | [[#Introduction|Introduction]] | ||
The Alarm Which Finally Roused Us From Our Slumber | [[#The Alarm Which Finally Roused Us From Our Slumber|The Alarm Which Finally Roused Us From Our Slumber]] | ||
The Next Step Down The Road To Oblivion | The Next Step Down The Road To Oblivion | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
{{box1 start}} | {{box1 start}} | ||
<span id="Introduction"></span> | |||
We are, all of us, standing on a civil liberties precipice. The systematic degradation of the rights of all citizens is now well underway. Through the pretext of safeguarding safety and security and, ironically, our “way of life,” governments worldwide are imposing limitations (and, within the U.S., unprecedented limitations) on our freedom of movement; rights stripped from us in the name of safety and security. | We are, all of us, standing on a civil liberties precipice. The systematic degradation of the rights of all citizens is now well underway. Through the pretext of safeguarding safety and security and, ironically, our “way of life,” governments worldwide are imposing limitations (and, within the U.S., unprecedented limitations) on our freedom of movement; rights stripped from us in the name of safety and security. | ||
Line 65: | Line 66: | ||
'''The Snowden Alarm Which Finally Woke Us''' | '''The Snowden Alarm Which Finally Woke Us''' | ||
<span id="The Alarm Which Finally Roused Us From Our Slumber "></span> | |||
We have learned, in extraordinary detail, of the wanton illegality in which our governments now engage through the remarkable revelations of Edward Snowden as well as those of Bradley Manning, William Binney, Thomas Drake and others. They have all taken a courageous stand to insist that government must be held to account for policies which identify liberty as incompatible with the interests of safety and security, policies which are, in any case (at least, in the United States) unconstitutional and illegal. | We have learned, in extraordinary detail, of the wanton illegality in which our governments now engage through the remarkable revelations of Edward Snowden as well as those of Bradley Manning, William Binney, Thomas Drake and others. They have all taken a courageous stand to insist that government must be held to account for policies which identify liberty as incompatible with the interests of safety and security, policies which are, in any case (at least, in the United States) unconstitutional and illegal. |
Revision as of 17:25, 29 June 2014
The free movement of the individual is increasingly seen as a revocable privilege, not an inalienable right, as the U.S., Interpol, and governments worldwide conspire to strip, not just “sex offenders”, but everyone of the fundamental right to travel and to cross borders Table Of Contents PART I: The Alarm Which Finally Roused Us From Our Slumber The Next Step Down The Road To Oblivion Understanding “International Megan's Law” “The International Megan's Law”: An Analysis The "Exterminating Angel" In the Driver's Seat PART II: The Actors: The National Security State, Post Snowden and Greenwald (and Manning and Assange and Scahill and Binney and Drake) Extending the Security State To Sex Offenders The “Five Eyes” INTERPOL's Big Makeover The Special Role of the Media In Driving the Sex Panic Non-Governmental Organizations Congress PART III: An Inescapable Conclusion Restless Natives Presumption Of Future Guilt Of Those Said To Be Victimizers (and of Eternal Saintliness of Those Said To Be Victims) Endnotes
|