Talk:Building a personal MAA website: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
User4 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


:: RE: 7 Abandoned entry, article, or draft left incomplete '''having structural issues that make it unreadable'''.
:: RE: 7 Abandoned entry, article, or draft left incomplete '''having structural issues that make it unreadable'''.
:: Feel free to fix it. You're the expert on wiki markup, aren't you? This article has good '''''content'''''. But you would delete it because you won't take a few minutes to fix the formatting? I am simply ''amazed'''. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 13:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
:: Feel free to fix it. You're the expert on wiki markup, aren't you? This article has good '''''content'''''. But you would delete it because you won't take a few minutes to fix the formatting? I am simply ''amazed'''. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 13:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
::: It is not my entry and I have no interest in this subject. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
::: It is not my entry and I have no interest in this subject. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
::::Then only articles that you have an interest in should appear on BoyWiki?
::::What a ''very strange attitude'' to have as the one in charge of BoyWiki!
::::Also: ''This entry it just too big of a mess and will never be fixable enough to be a useable article.''
::::That is an absurd statement, and is not factually correct. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 13:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:40, 20 June 2015

Proposed for deletion

This entry it just too big of a mess and will never be fixable enough to be a useable article.

  • 4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events)--Etenne (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
  • 7 Abandoned entry, article, or draft left incomplete having structural issues that make it unreadable.
RE: 7 Abandoned entry, article, or draft left incomplete having structural issues that make it unreadable.
Feel free to fix it. You're the expert on wiki markup, aren't you? This article has good content. But you would delete it because you won't take a few minutes to fix the formatting? I am simply amazed'. User4 (talk) 13:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
It is not my entry and I have no interest in this subject. --Etenne (talk) 13:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Then only articles that you have an interest in should appear on BoyWiki?
What a very strange attitude to have as the one in charge of BoyWiki!
Also: This entry it just too big of a mess and will never be fixable enough to be a useable article.
That is an absurd statement, and is not factually correct. User4 (talk) 13:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)