Talk:Encylopedia of Homosexuality: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
New page: Unless you are going to write an article about this, would this go better as a link for homosexuality? --~~~~----
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 09:55, 18 March 2014 (GMT)----
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 09:55, 18 March 2014 (GMT)----
Hmm... looking at your suggestion through "the pedophile gaze", a pedo would see that link, and think "'''''WTF''''' do ''I'' care about PVFs!!!" So he wouldn't follow the link, not knowing that Wayne Dyer includes a lot of information about "pederasty" (hebe- ephebo- filia (I'm not checking the spelling on those terms P~
Of course, a ''smart'' "scribe" (one who "scribbles" on BW) might say to himself, "Gee - the Ency. of Homo. has some ''great stuff'' for BLs, so I'll make an entry here so that either I can remember to come back to it, or someone else can run with the ball and indicate the value of certain articles to BLs."
But given that I am ''not'' a smart "scribe", the above did not occur to me. Instead, I introduced the link to what I thought was a PVF encyclopedia which I thought had no possible useful information about BL and BLs.
'Cause I'm ''very'' dumb.
And I'm in a very bad mood (right now)...
My bad...
[[User:User4|User4]] 23:02, 19 March 2014 (GMT)
----
Please don't take what I say as a criticism, I understand that you have not been doing this very long. Think of it more as a helpful tip. 
Once you have done this for awhile, you will get a better feel of where things should go.
It is always good to improve short general pages on a topic then to add more specialized pages when the general page gets too long.
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 11:06, 20 March 2014 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 11:06, 20 March 2014

Unless you are going to write an article about this, would this go better as a link for homosexuality?


--Etenne 09:55, 18 March 2014 (GMT)----


Hmm... looking at your suggestion through "the pedophile gaze", a pedo would see that link, and think "WTF do I care about PVFs!!!" So he wouldn't follow the link, not knowing that Wayne Dyer includes a lot of information about "pederasty" (hebe- ephebo- filia (I'm not checking the spelling on those terms P~

Of course, a smart "scribe" (one who "scribbles" on BW) might say to himself, "Gee - the Ency. of Homo. has some great stuff for BLs, so I'll make an entry here so that either I can remember to come back to it, or someone else can run with the ball and indicate the value of certain articles to BLs."

But given that I am not a smart "scribe", the above did not occur to me. Instead, I introduced the link to what I thought was a PVF encyclopedia which I thought had no possible useful information about BL and BLs.

'Cause I'm very dumb.

And I'm in a very bad mood (right now)...

My bad...

User4 23:02, 19 March 2014 (GMT)


Please don't take what I say as a criticism, I understand that you have not been doing this very long. Think of it more as a helpful tip.

Once you have done this for awhile, you will get a better feel of where things should go.

It is always good to improve short general pages on a topic then to add more specialized pages when the general page gets too long.

--Etenne 11:06, 20 March 2014 (GMT)