Help talk:Contents: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
IMHO this page needs some serious work. |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:User4|User4]] 23:49, 1 March 2014 (GMT) | [[User:User4|User4]] 23:49, 1 March 2014 (GMT) | ||
--- | |||
The thing about words under three letters ''not being included'' in the search is NOT CORRECT. | |||
[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:52, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | |||
:Neither is the thing about the go button... that was a feature on the old wiki software.--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 14:55, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | |||
::Until all these kinds of things are fixed, it is '''''impossible''''' for me to finish the "Editor's help" page. ''Now'' do you understand? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 15:05, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | |||
::: yes, I understand completely. My suggestion is to use Wikipedia help pages or MediaWiki as a guide then modify their pages to meet our needs. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 15:18, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | |||
::::That is ''exactly'' what I ''had'' been doing. Then I kept running into problems with templates that did not exist, "magic words" that didn't work, characters that did not reproduce correctly, etc. etc. I ''still'' don't know what has been "fixed" in this updated wiki version. | |||
::::I suppose I could go back, and try to figure out what ''now'' works that did ''not'' work before. But that is truly mind-numbing work... '''''Not Fun At All...''''' | |||
::::We'll see. I'll consider it. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 15:31, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | |||
:LOL @ User4 '''''Not Fun At All...''''' I suppose that is why it never gets done. I find writing help pages incredibly tedious. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 15:35, 7 April 2014 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 7 April 2014
IMHO this page needs some serious work.
User4 23:49, 1 March 2014 (GMT)
---
The thing about words under three letters not being included in the search is NOT CORRECT.
User4 (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2014 (CEST)
- Neither is the thing about the go button... that was a feature on the old wiki software.--Etenne (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2014 (CEST)
- That is exactly what I had been doing. Then I kept running into problems with templates that did not exist, "magic words" that didn't work, characters that did not reproduce correctly, etc. etc. I still don't know what has been "fixed" in this updated wiki version.
- I suppose I could go back, and try to figure out what now works that did not work before. But that is truly mind-numbing work... Not Fun At All...