BoyWiki talk:Relevance policy: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
→Protection: new section |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Protection == | == Protection == | ||
There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? Bad edits can always be reverted. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Films featuring boys, but not about boylove == | |||
Can articles be created about movies such as ''{{w|Flight of the Navigator}}'' that aren't about boylove but sometimes inspire boylove? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 19:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Of course, Boylove = anything about boys or boylovers. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 20:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:14, 23 March 2015
GL stuff
This gets tricky because there's some GL stuff, e.g. the case U.S. v. Knox, that also affects BLs. Lysander (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Protection
There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? Bad edits can always be reverted. Lysander (talk) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Films featuring boys, but not about boylove
Can articles be created about movies such as Flight of the Navigator that aren't about boylove but sometimes inspire boylove? Lysander (talk) 19:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
