Template talk:CH: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
refine and tweak |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Agreed! This header is appropriate for pages that readers come to absorb, not in-wiki stuff. That why I just made a change to [[Template:Template category header]] __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 19:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | :Agreed! This header is appropriate for pages that readers come to absorb, not in-wiki stuff. That why I just made a change to [[Template:Template category header]] __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 19:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::You have to understand that I was receiving a lot of complaints that people were unable to navigate and find things on BoyWiki. Since I added this template, the complaints have stopped. I must have done something right? --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 19:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ::You have to understand that I was receiving a lot of complaints that people were unable to navigate and find things on BoyWiki. Since I added this template, the complaints have stopped. I must have done something right? --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 19:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Of course it was right. We just have to refine and tweak the system. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 19:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:13, 25 November 2015
For the more "meta" pages, for example Category:Fledglings, might it not be better to use a different template than this, that focuses more on wiki maintenance and other meta issues? Also, for the user categories, might it not be better to have a template that pertains to users? Lysander (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed! This header is appropriate for pages that readers come to absorb, not in-wiki stuff. That why I just made a change to Template:Template category header __meco (talk) 19:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
