Talk:Sexual intercourse (dictionary)

I started a thread on BoyChat to discuss this topic https://www.boychat.org/messages/1469368.htm I am not sure this is an appropriate entry for BoyWiki but I am willing to hear arguments on both sides before making a decision. --Etenne 12:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Worldbook dictionary:

• ★sexual intercourse
• the uniting or joining of sexual organs, usually with ejaculation of semen; coitus; copulation.

Collins English Dictionary:

• sexual intercourse
• Sexual intercourse is the physical act of sex between two people. (FORMAL)
• N-UNCOUNT

Merriam Webster:

• sexual intercourse
• noun
• Date: 1799
• 1. heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis ; coitus
• 2. intercourse (as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis

The New Oxford Thesaurus of English

• sex
• noun
• 1 a group of teenage boys sat around the table talking about sex
• SEXUAL INTERCOURSE , intercourse, lovemaking, making love, sex act, sexual relations, sexual/vaginal/anal penetration; mating; informal nooky; Brit. informal bonking, rumpy pumpy, a bit of the other, how's your father; S. African informal pata-pata; vulgar slang screwing, fucking; Brit. vulgar slang shagging; formal coitus, coition, copulation; archaic fornication, carnal knowledge, congress, commerce.
• 2 you can learn how to teach your children about sex
• THE FACTS OF LIFE , sexual reproduction, reproduction; informal the birds and the bees.
• 3 adults of both sexes
• GENDER.
• have sex
• HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE (WITH) ,
• MAKE LOVE (TO) , sleep with/together, go to bed with/together; mate (with); seduce, rape, ravish; informal do it, do the business, go all the way, make whoopee, have one's way with, bed, know someone in the biblical sense, tumble; Brit. informal bonk, get one's oats; N. Amer. informal boff, get it on (with); euphemistic be intimate (with); vulgar slang fuck, screw, bang, lay, get one's leg over, shaft, dick, frig, do, have, hump, poke, shtup, dip one's wick, ride, service, tup; Brit. vulgar slang have it away (with), have it off (with), shag, knob, get one's end away, knock someone off, give someone one, roger, grind, stuff; Scottish vulgar slang podger; N. Amer. vulgar slang ball, jump, jump someone's bones, bone, pork, diddle, nail; Austral./NZ vulgar slang root; formal copulate (with); archaic fornicate (with), possess, lie with/together, couple (with), swive, know.

American Heritage dictionary:

• sexual intercourse
• n.
• 1. Coitus between human beings.
• 2. Sexual union between human beings involving genital contact other than vaginal penetration by the penis.

I have hundreds more dictionaries--would you like some more definitions? Or would you like to allow the rabble on BoyChat to define English terms? User4 (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

If by "rabble" you mean, Would I like to get a better understanding of how the average BL defines and uses this term and if they believe that it relates to us ... then yes --Etenne 14:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Do you really believe that when John Q. Public reads in the paper that Joe Pedo was convicted of having sexual intercourse with a boy, that John Q. Public cares what the "average boylover" thinks that "sexual intercourse" means? Really? 14:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

There's the rub because this is a site about the history of boylove and I do care what BL's think and not at all what the John Q. Public thinks beyond keeping this site legal and close to PG rated--Etenne 14:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

There is a myth about BoyLovers. This myth is used to condemn us. To make us into Monster Predators.

The myth is that BoyLovers use boys only as sexual objects, and, specifically, that BoyLovers use boys to be the receivers of anal intercourse. We must combat that myth, even if we step over the line into PG or even X rated!

If we don't, then we are lost!

And, yes, that does relate to the everyday lives of BoyLovers. User4 (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I appreciate your position however PG is the goal, keeping in mind that if you are ever linked to this site no matter what you write will be described as pornographic. --Etenne 14:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern regarding my personal security, and reminding me that what I write here may be "incriminating" and "used against me". I have already taken that into consideration, and the steps I have taken to ensure my personal security seem to be (so far, at least) quite sufficient. Were the LEO really out to "get me," AND if my security was actually faulty, then there is no reason for the LEO to have waited so long to do so, especially given what I have written elsewhere, as well as what I have written here. You'll never take me alive, you dirty coppers! User4 (talk) 14:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)