User talk:Will Robinson: Difference between revisions
New page: Nice to see that someone is getting the word out about what really happened with the Azov Films Prosecutions. As you may know, Wikipedia's article on the topic, [[wikipedia:2013 Intern... |
→Similar to Azov, but different: new section |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nice to see that someone is getting the word out about what really happened with the [[Azov Films Prosecutions]]. As you may know, Wikipedia's article on the topic, [[wikipedia:2013 International child pornography investigation]], was a pretty atrocious propaganda piece until recently, when editors started making it more neutral. Another article that's been in flux lately has been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet-initiated_sex_crimes_against_minors&action=history this one]. I guess Wikipedia needs some people to go over there to do basically the opposite of what [[SqueakBox]] does, but in a subtle enough manner that they don't get accused of [[pedophile advocacy]]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] 00:32, 26 March 2014 (GMT) | Nice to see that someone is getting the word out about what really happened with the [[Azov Films Prosecutions]]. As you may know, Wikipedia's article on the topic, [[wikipedia:2013 International child pornography investigation]], was a pretty atrocious propaganda piece until recently, when editors started making it more neutral. Another article that's been in flux lately has been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet-initiated_sex_crimes_against_minors&action=history this one]. I guess Wikipedia needs some people to go over there to do basically the opposite of what [[SqueakBox]] does, but in a subtle enough manner that they don't get accused of [[pedophile advocacy]]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] 00:32, 26 March 2014 (GMT) | ||
Will - you have a message | |||
https://boychat.org/messages/1438400.htm | |||
[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 05:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks for book == | |||
Much appreciate your posting the Children's Sexuality function and the links at the end. [[User:Wanker|Wanker]] ([[User talk:Wanker|talk]]) 11:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Similar to Azov, but different == | |||
[[Richard Emerich]] was a photographer who (innocently) took (non-sexual but nude) photos of boys for his modeling agency, but was arrested and convicted on "child pornography" charges. The USPS pulled the same tricks on him that they did with Azov. | |||
It seems to me that--with the similarities to the Azov prosecutions--that you (or someone else [but, sorry--not me--I'm too busy with other things]) could write this up better for BoyWiki. Any thoughts about that? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:55, 14 April 2016
Nice to see that someone is getting the word out about what really happened with the Azov Films Prosecutions. As you may know, Wikipedia's article on the topic, wikipedia:2013 International child pornography investigation, was a pretty atrocious propaganda piece until recently, when editors started making it more neutral. Another article that's been in flux lately has been this one. I guess Wikipedia needs some people to go over there to do basically the opposite of what SqueakBox does, but in a subtle enough manner that they don't get accused of pedophile advocacy. Leucosticte 00:32, 26 March 2014 (GMT)
Will - you have a message https://boychat.org/messages/1438400.htm User4 (talk) 05:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for book
Much appreciate your posting the Children's Sexuality function and the links at the end. Wanker (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Similar to Azov, but different
Richard Emerich was a photographer who (innocently) took (non-sexual but nude) photos of boys for his modeling agency, but was arrested and convicted on "child pornography" charges. The USPS pulled the same tricks on him that they did with Azov.
It seems to me that--with the similarities to the Azov prosecutions--that you (or someone else [but, sorry--not me--I'm too busy with other things]) could write this up better for BoyWiki. Any thoughts about that? User4 (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
