Pedophilia - What is harmful?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
its -> his |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<dl> | <dl> | ||
<dt>Forced prostitution</dt> | <dt>Forced prostitution</dt> | ||
<dd>The child is kept by a pimp who completely controls | <dd>The child is kept by a pimp who completely controls his life.</dd> | ||
<dt> </dt> | <dt> </dt> | ||
<dt>Assault by a close family member</dt> | <dt>Assault by a close family member</dt> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<dt> </dt> | <dt> </dt> | ||
<dt>Prostitution by necessity</dt> | <dt>Prostitution by necessity</dt> | ||
<dd>The child is working as a prostitute in order to provide for | <dd>The child is working as a prostitute in order to provide for himself | ||
and | and his family. Is not controlled by a pimp.</dd> | ||
<dt> </dt> | <dt> </dt> | ||
<dt>Exploitation of dependence</dt> | <dt>Exploitation of dependence</dt> | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<dd>The child is selling sexual favors even though alternative sources | <dd>The child is selling sexual favors even though alternative sources | ||
of income are available and the child is not in economical need. The | of income are available and the child is not in economical need. The | ||
child seeks out | child seeks out his own customers and can avoid unpleasant customers.</dd> | ||
<dt> </dt> | <dt> </dt> | ||
<dt>Soft prostitution</dt> | <dt>Soft prostitution</dt> | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
nevertheless, a possibility that the child suffers psychologically if the social | nevertheless, a possibility that the child suffers psychologically if the social | ||
environment condemns the relationship and reacts dramatically and hysterically | environment condemns the relationship and reacts dramatically and hysterically | ||
upon disclosure. The child may be subjected to prolonged police interviews, | upon disclosure. The child may be subjected to prolonged police interviews, his | ||
secrets may be revealed on the front page of all newspapers, and the child's | secrets may be revealed on the front page of all newspapers, and the child's | ||
best friend is demonized. The child is prevented from talking with the only | best friend is demonized. The child is prevented from talking with the only | ||
person that understands | person that understands his feelings. Instead it is thrown into the arms of a | ||
well-intentioned therapist who is brainwashing the child until he or she | well-intentioned therapist who is brainwashing the child until he or she | ||
accepts | accepts his role as <i>victim</i>. Most pedophiles refrain from having sex with | ||
children because of the risk that such atrocities may happen to the child, even | children because of the risk that such atrocities may happen to the child, even | ||
though these consequences can hardly be blamed on the pedophile. | though these consequences can hardly be blamed on the pedophile. | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
*[[Pedophilia, Science and Self-Deception]] | *[[Pedophilia, Science and Self-Deception]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Pedophilia]] |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 16 July 2016
What is harmful?
The public discussion on children and sex is dominated by the tendency that anything that has to do with sex is called abuse, and any type of abuse is said to cause sinister psychological trauma. Such claims are often spiced with examples of children who have endured terrible ordeals and have been harmed for life. But such bombastic stories reflect only a small part of reality.
It is important to set things straight and realize that certain sexual events are more harmful to children than others. For the sake of simplicity, we have set up this diagram indicating what is more or less harmful. The events that rank highest on the list are the ones that cause the most severe psychological trauma. As we go down the list, we get less psychological problems and more positive experiences.
|
The cases at the bottom of the list are not in themselves harmful. There is,
nevertheless, a possibility that the child suffers psychologically if the social
environment condemns the relationship and reacts dramatically and hysterically
upon disclosure. The child may be subjected to prolonged police interviews, his
secrets may be revealed on the front page of all newspapers, and the child's
best friend is demonized. The child is prevented from talking with the only
person that understands his feelings. Instead it is thrown into the arms of a
well-intentioned therapist who is brainwashing the child until he or she
accepts his role as victim. Most pedophiles refrain from having sex with
children because of the risk that such atrocities may happen to the child, even
though these consequences can hardly be blamed on the pedophile.
Most statistical investigations show that more girls than boys are traumatized by sex. This is first and foremost due to the fact that it is predominantly girls who are subjected to the cases that rank high on the damage list, while boys typically are found in the types of relationships that rank low on the diagram.
Of course, a full evaluation must also consider what kind of sexual act has taken place. Obviously, a vaginal or anal intercourse is more painful the smaller the child is. The physical pain may worsen the psychological trauma. Oral sex, masturbation, and simple fondling may not involve physical pain, but can still cause severe psychological pain if it happens under conditions that rank high on the list shown above.
Voluntary pedophile relationships are very often homosexual (man/boy or woman/girl). This may cause identity problems, especially to boys in cultures where homosexuality is considered un-manly. It is well-known that many children are going through a homosexual phase in their life without being permanently homosexual. Investigations have shown that most of the boys who are involved in such relationships are going to live an ordinary heterosexual family life when they become adult. It is important to inform about this fact in order to avoid that boys get problems with their own homosexual impulses.
Many pedophiles use child pornography as a substitute for sex. It is important to discuss whether the consumers of child porn are indirectly harming children by sustaining a possibly harmful production. The circumstances under which child porn is produced are not always the same and not always equally harmful. In some cases the porn is produced by cynical mafia-types who believe the media claims that there are big money in child porn (which, in fact, there aren't). More often, however, the porn is produced by happy amateurs with no economical motives. They are making the pictures for their own gratification and give away copies to other pedophiles. Whoever pays for child porn may in fact be sustaining a production of the first kind. But the person who receives it for free from a friend or finds some material that somebody has planted anonymously on the internet is not harming any child, because the material would have been produced anyway. He is more likely to harm himself, however, if the police can trace his activities.
SOURCE: http://web.archive.org/web/20050418011102/http://205.205.236.41/english/harm.php#1