Talk:For a Lost Soldier (film): Difference between revisions
Created page with "I believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article. Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interest..." |
m Etenne moved page Talk:For a Lost Soldier (Film) to Talk:For a Lost Soldier (film) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article. Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interested in the ''book'', and not take the time to read the whole article. | I ''still'' believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article (even if it is now disambiguated, (have I created a new word?) as I just noticed.) Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interested in the ''book'', and not take the time to read the whole article. | ||
Many people on the Internet are in a big hurry. They don't spend time on things that they consider to not be interesting -- the attention span of the average person today is rather short. | Many people on the Internet are in a big hurry. They don't spend time on things that they consider to not be interesting -- the attention span of the average person today is rather short. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:14, 7 March 2015
I still believe that the option for the book should be at the head of the article (even if it is now disambiguated, (have I created a new word?) as I just noticed.) Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the film when they are only interested in the book, and not take the time to read the whole article.
Many people on the Internet are in a big hurry. They don't spend time on things that they consider to not be interesting -- the attention span of the average person today is rather short.
Wikipedia (and other wikis) use this style. Of course, we could choose to use a completely different style from all the other wikis.
But I suspect that doing so will not endear us to our visitors. Why take a chance on alienating the people who come here? User4 (talk) 05:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
