Talk:Sex offender risk assessment: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
User4 (talk | contribs)
Created page with "This belongs in a general article on Sex Offenders or Sex Offenses. I see little or no reason for an article containing so little information relevant to BoyLovers to be a "st..."
 
Lysander (talk | contribs)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:*Please ask yourself before hitting the save button  
:*Please ask yourself before hitting the save button  
:::Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove?  [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 02:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
:::Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove?  [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 02:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
::::Yes, it does have relevance. A lot of boylovers end up going through risk assessments. It's a stub now, but it has potential to become a featured article if expanded and improved enough. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
== Wow, there's hardly anything there ==
I'd forgotten this article was so short. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 20:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:34, 19 September 2015

This belongs in a general article on Sex Offenders or Sex Offenses. I see little or no reason for an article containing so little information relevant to BoyLovers to be a "standalone" article at BoyWiki.

  • Please ask yourself before hitting the save button
Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? User4 (talk) 02:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it does have relevance. A lot of boylovers end up going through risk assessments. It's a stub now, but it has potential to become a featured article if expanded and improved enough. Lysander (talk) 02:26, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Wow, there's hardly anything there

I'd forgotten this article was so short. Lysander (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)