BoyWiki:Agora/3 December 2015: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
:These are the rules that have allowed Free Spirits to continue to operate for the last 20 years. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 12:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC) | :These are the rules that have allowed Free Spirits to continue to operate for the last 20 years. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 12:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
::Well, those aren't '''MY''' words, they are quoted from a work of art, the whole idea being to convey a deeper insight that couldn't possibly be achieved in clinical terminology. And besides, I've raised the issue here at Agora '''[[BoyWiki:Agora#BoyWiki for boys?|very recently]]''' about how this wiki presents itself, and to whom. It seems that the '''<span style='color:#FF0000;'>y</span><span style='color:#E90015;'>o</span><span style='color:#D4002A;'>u</span><span style='color:#BF003F;'>n</span><span style='color:#AA0055;'>g</span> <span style='color:#7F007F;'>p</span><span style='color:#6A0094;'>e</span><span style='color:#5500AA;'>o</span><span style='color:#3F00BF;'>p</span><span style='color:#2A00D4;'>l</span><span style='color:#1500E9;'>e</span>''' involved in this whole scene is far from being part of the target audience, let alone considered subjects whose possible inputs and interests would be considered. Instead, this seems to be destined entirely to be a '''<span style='color:#E3A410;'>b</span><span style='color:#BE8A0D;'>o</span><span style='color:#9A700B;'>r</span><span style='color:#765608;'>i</span><span style='color:#523C06;'>n</span><span style='color:#2E2203;'>g</span>''' website for adults, preferrably ones with a proclivity for higher academia. | |||
:: | |||
::Hey, why don't we change the name of this wiki from '''<span style='color:#FF0000;'>B</span><span style='color:#AA0055;'>o</span><span style='color:#5500AA;'>y</span><span style='color:#0000FF;'>W</span><span style='color:#0055AA;'>i</span><span style='color:#00AA55;'>k</span><span style='color:#00FF00;'>i</span>''' to '''<font color=#C4AC4D>BoyLover's wiki</font>''' and be very honest about totally not representing any boys involved in all of this. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 20:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::ChildWiki is specifically geared towards being a place for the most controversial content, so you did well by putting it there. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 22:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
[[Category:Agora archive]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 21 December 2015
Agora/3 December 2015
What the fuck?
This and this is totally unacceptable to me. This is kindergarten-level censorship, an I find in intolerable. __meco (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Users should refrain from getting too detailed in any discussions of a sexual nature. Wording should be chosen carefully when issues of sexuality arise.
- When in doubt of the graphic nature of what you want to say, use clinical terminology, sexually uncharged phrases, or euphemisms, and refrain from being descriptive.
- Sigpics also have the potential to be considered erotica. Therefore, overly erotic sigpics or sigpics that depict genitalia or any sexual act, photographically or otherwise, will not be registered.
- Posts written as erotica will be deleted. Overly sexual details included without thought will be edited, and when necessary, overly sexual discussions will be deleted.
- Repeat offenders will be warned and may be subject to banning.
https://www.boychat.org/intent.html#rule1
- These are the rules that have allowed Free Spirits to continue to operate for the last 20 years. --Etenne (talk) 12:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, those aren't MY words, they are quoted from a work of art, the whole idea being to convey a deeper insight that couldn't possibly be achieved in clinical terminology. And besides, I've raised the issue here at Agora very recently about how this wiki presents itself, and to whom. It seems that the young people involved in this whole scene is far from being part of the target audience, let alone considered subjects whose possible inputs and interests would be considered. Instead, this seems to be destined entirely to be a boring website for adults, preferrably ones with a proclivity for higher academia.
- Hey, why don't we change the name of this wiki from BoyWiki to BoyLover's wiki and be very honest about totally not representing any boys involved in all of this. __meco (talk) 20:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
