USER4/DRAFT/Pennyphile: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
User4 (talk | contribs)
Why do we need to talk about the sexual activity that men engage in with boys? This should give you some idea...
 
User4 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 13: Line 13:
See, it's all because the ''palms of boy's hands'' are not considered to be "sexual," but, of course, the boys' penises ''are'' considered sexual--and, therefore, to be dirty, nasty, shameful, and the rightful subject of societies opprobrium and condemnation. All this, of course, to "protect the innocence" of the boys.
See, it's all because the ''palms of boy's hands'' are not considered to be "sexual," but, of course, the boys' penises ''are'' considered sexual--and, therefore, to be dirty, nasty, shameful, and the rightful subject of societies opprobrium and condemnation. All this, of course, to "protect the innocence" of the boys.


Thank god humans don't have sex by shaking hands! If they did, men would be considered to be raping of every other man and boy they met!
Thank god humans don't have sex by shaking hands! If they did, men would be considered to be raping every other man and boy they greet!


<small>''Sheesh!''</small>
<small>''Sheesh!''</small>

Latest revision as of 16:09, 21 March 2016

A pennyphile is a male who engages in pennyphilia with prepubescent boys. The pennyphile grooms the boys, sometimes for long periods of time--and often befriends the mother of the boy in an attempt to gain the mother's trust--which will then allow the male to pursue his pennyphilic interests in the boy.

Pennyphilic activity consists of the men placing pennies in the palms of the hands of their innocent young child victims--including little boys as young as 2 years old!

But society is little aware of the existence of pennyphiles, as their behavior seems (on the surface) so innocent. And perhaps it is innocent.

But if pennyphiles, instead, wanted to put pennies onto the penises of little boys, then society would become outraged. And, surely enough, laws would be passed against "monster pennyphiles," and soon the rabid anti-penniests would (falsely) accuse the pennyphiles of wanting to insert the pennies into the anuses of the boys! Though this would be factually incorrect, the public would accept these (false) claims without question, and the hysterical reactions of the public (and the incarceration of pennyphiles) would grow exponentially.

Just as what happened when the antisexuals and homophobes began to (falsely) accuse BoyLovers (meaning true pedophiles) of wanting to insert their penises into the anuses of little boys, which, of course, is almost always untrue.

And, the irony of it all is that with pennyphiles we're just talking about pennies being given to boys by men...

See, it's all because the palms of boy's hands are not considered to be "sexual," but, of course, the boys' penises are considered sexual--and, therefore, to be dirty, nasty, shameful, and the rightful subject of societies opprobrium and condemnation. All this, of course, to "protect the innocence" of the boys.

Thank god humans don't have sex by shaking hands! If they did, men would be considered to be raping every other man and boy they greet!

Sheesh!