Talk:Interfemoral intercourse (dictionary)

How is this different from Intercrural intercourse (dictionary) and could the two entries be combined? I believe that Intercrural intercourse is the more frequently used term in writings? --Etenne 13:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

OK upon a little further research, I can see that both terms have the exact same definition. I can also see how having both entries as a stand alone entry is needed, as both terms seem useful to know --Etenne 13:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. Would you like to combine them, and put a redirect from one to the other or shall I (when I have time, of course, so don't hold your breath...) (I believe that intercrural is less common than interfemoral, but I wouldn't bet on it) User4 (talk) 13:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Off-topic: Do you have a copy of the movie, "For a lost soldier"? Can you remember the scene when the boy is on his stomach, and the man is lying on the back of the boy? My copy of the movie is very very low resolution, so details aren't very clear. The question is: Did the boy bite the finger of the man as the man was doing whatever-he-was-doing with the boy? The real question, of course, is: Was it anal intercourse, or interfemoral intercourse? If the boy bit the man's finger, then it would seem to have been the former and not the latter. What do you think? Can you take a look at the movie and let me know? User4 (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I remember the scene but I would think you would have to read the book to know what the scene depicts? --Etenne 14:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

More reading? Don't you think it would be better if I finish proofing the dozens of books that are (almost) finished, except for the proofing? For example, Mitzel's "Boston Sex Scandal" just needs 30 more pages of proofing, and it will be done. User4 (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

I am sure that is a wondrous use of your time and well spent. I simple do not know what the scene is meant to actually depict other then the love physically expressed between these two people. I have no idea if the book goes into any more detail about that either. Plus, I don't speak a work of Dutch (to understand what is said in the film). --Etenne 14:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

A quick-and-dirty search of the book gives this:

"...He spits into his palm - in a flash he has become a mirror image of Jan - and runs his hand between my legs. Then, warily, as if I might break, he starts to lie down on top of me, a building collapsing above me, a loosened rock about to crush me in its fall. He leans on his arms, his eye right above me, and gives me a reassuring smile. As he reaches down with one hand, he says, half-whispering: 'Sooo...'

I feel something - his hand? - making a smooth unchecked dive between my tightly squeezed legs. He slides down and in one short movement squeezes all my will power out of me. His arms seem to hold me in an embrace, but he is involved in a grim battle, snarling and straining convulsively as his breath comes fast and furious and his bristly hair brushes against my face.

When he raises himself up on his knees he looks past me as if I do not exist. Much as I once watched the hands of a doctor reaching for the gleaming instruments with which to snip the tonsils in my throat, so I watch his movements now. He spits large gobs into his hand, and then resumes that frantic activity of his. Why am I making no sound or protest, why am I not screaming out loud?

Suddenly he bites the top of my arm hard with knife-sharp teeth, and then I do give a twisted scream, tears burning in my eyes. The soldier has a red smear across his chin. Annoyed, he puts a hand over my mouth and makes a hissing sound.

His fingers smell of tobacco and iron. He is cutting off my breath and throttling me slowly, a great roaring pressure in my ears, a swelling-up of noise. Then he heaves himself up a little and something shoots across my body, running on salamander-like feet over my belly and my ribs in a thin line. As he collapses on top of me our bodies give a strange squelch, like a wet foot in the mud."

So, it looks interfemoral, because he shot his load on the boy's back. Why would he have pulled out, if it were anal? And the boy doesn't seem to indicate he was penetrated.

I don't know if there were other scenes... I really don't have time for this... User4 (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)