Talk:Etenne: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
User4 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
User4 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 92: Line 92:


---
---
Interesting study, which is somewhat relevant (parts are <em>very</em> relevant):
The Cost of Homophobia: Literature Review on the Human Impact of Homophobia On Canada by Christopher Banks
http://www.ibrarian.net/navon/paper/The_Cost_of_Homophobia__Literature_Review_on_the_.pdf?paperid=2267464
[[User:User4|User4]] 06:15, 6 March 2014 (GMT)

Revision as of 06:15, 6 March 2014

---

test

word

Hmm. Why is that "better"?

user4

I don't know... it says that in the instruction manual. my guess is that it has to do with the software and how it creates a page. The wiki environment wants wiki code:)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Cheatsheet

Because I say so! --Etenne 19:15, 28 February 2014 (GMT)

---

What? Just because you run this place, you think you run this place?

Oh, boy...



http://archive.is/uryourstory.org


User4 08:21, 1 March 2014 (GMT)

Now that you have added the Cheat sheet‎ you need to edit it to make it compatible with BoyWiki. That is excellent practice in getting to know how things work.

--Etenne 11:17, 1 March 2014 (GMT)

---

"Nothing posted on the Internet ever disappears forever."

Hmm... Now I see that that bit of everyday knowledge is wrong, too. ;-)

I also see why 'scribes' have a hard time. It is a bit complicated, the editing of wiki articles. I can see how many become quickly disheartened...

OK - I'll work on that page. When I figure out where it is, and what can be one...

Oh, and how was your pizza? I was busy backing-up several hundred articles I am involved with preparing for publishing on another site. Then I ran into those 'images', and decided to save most of that site to archive.is. Bernie now seems aware of its existence. Curious, that. (Any of those images useful for you to use in BoyWiki?) I am still doing the backing-up of those other articles. I'm not sure how many more to go. :- (

Oh, and that 'work-around' for editing Wikipedia? Bernie interested?

And that other Azov wiki suggestion - any thoughts?

Talk to me, dude!

How come four ' marks in front, and four ' marks in back don't give bold and italic?

CORRECTION: I got it - it's five that works.

User4 12:09, 1 March 2014 (GMT)

On Editing: that is why it is best just to start small when learning to edit. Newbies can always stick to just plain text.

Azov wiki = too big of a job and more trouble than I am prepared to deal with. I'll stick to one wiki:)

I did a little editing on your Cheat sheet‎ page and added it to your Category:Junktest‎

More Coffee!

--Etenne 12:15, 1 March 2014 (GMT)

---

Ah! It's three that bolds. I'll bet we have that info somewhere. We need a "cheat sheet" for "scribes", don't we? And then the "scribes" should all read it, right?

I saw your alterations to my Cheat sheet‎. Oh, boy! I've got my very own page! NOT!

User4 12:43, 1 March 2014 (GMT)

---

download and read this re: why antis do what they do: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ801193.pdf

In case you missed these, they are also important:

http://www.tanadineen.com/writer/articles/ForDistribution/Skeptic.pdf

tanadineen.com/documents/MV3.pdf

http://whoresofthecourt.com/WotC%20Book.pdf

User4 22:18, 5 March 2014 (GMT)

---

Interesting study, which is somewhat relevant (parts are very relevant):

The Cost of Homophobia: Literature Review on the Human Impact of Homophobia On Canada by Christopher Banks

http://www.ibrarian.net/navon/paper/The_Cost_of_Homophobia__Literature_Review_on_the_.pdf?paperid=2267464

User4 06:15, 6 March 2014 (GMT)