Voodoo Molestation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Voodoo Molestation and US Law== | ==Voodoo Molestation and US Law== | ||
In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that damages could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by those who have viewed the image in the magical belief that viewing the image | In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that damages could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by those who have viewed the image in the magical belief that viewing the image has caused damage to the soul of the subject. | ||
Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching | Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching | ||
Revision as of 12:07, 28 April 2014
Voodoo describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.[1] Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.[2] While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul. Most of the people today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking
Voodoo Molestation and US Law
In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that damages could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by those who have viewed the image in the magical belief that viewing the image has caused damage to the soul of the subject.
Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching
Re-victimization http://www.publicengines.com/blog/2010/02/03/re-victimization-and-restitution-for-victims-of-child-pornography/
Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/
References
- ↑ The religious belief that a photograph can steal a soul. Retrieved on April 27, 2014.
- ↑ Edwards, Elizabeth. Oxford Companion to the Photograph:magic and superstition. Oxford University Press. Retrieved on April 27, 2014.
- ↑ http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8380/did-some-cultures-believe-that-photography-can-steal-your-soul
