Template:Science and technology: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[Meta-Analysis Prevalence Pedophilia Hebephilia by Filip Schuster]] | * [[Meta-Analysis Prevalence Pedophilia Hebephilia by Filip Schuster]] | ||
:A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli. Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly sexually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents). Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed. | :A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli. Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly sexually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents). Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed. | ||
</div> | |||
<div style="margin:12px; border:1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0.2em 0.4em; background-color:#f8f8ff; align:left;" font-size:120%;"> | |||
*[http://www.jaapl.org/content/42/4/404.full Pedophilia and DSM-5: The Importance of Clearly Defining the Nature of a Pedophilic Disorder] (Fred S. Berlin, MD, PhD - the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law) | |||
::Psychiatric terminology should convey information in as clear and unambiguous a manner as possible. In light of the associated stigma, that is especially so of the terms Pedophilia and Pedophilic Disorder. Although from a psychiatric perspective the term Pedophilia is intended to define a recognized clinical entity, in the collective consciousness of contemporary society, the term has become a demonizing pejorative. <!-- Added 12-24-14 --> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 24 December 2014
 |
Science and technology
- A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli. Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly sexually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents). Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed.
- Pedophilia and DSM-5: The Importance of Clearly Defining the Nature of a Pedophilic Disorder (Fred S. Berlin, MD, PhD - the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law)
- Psychiatric terminology should convey information in as clear and unambiguous a manner as possible. In light of the associated stigma, that is especially so of the terms Pedophilia and Pedophilic Disorder. Although from a psychiatric perspective the term Pedophilia is intended to define a recognized clinical entity, in the collective consciousness of contemporary society, the term has become a demonizing pejorative.
