Talk:Polygraph: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
Created page with "The punishment part of the Polygraph test for RSO on parole (as a parole requirement) is that they are not free nor is electronic monitoring. The average person released with..." |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The punishment part of the Polygraph test for RSO on parole (as a parole requirement) is that they are not free nor is electronic monitoring. The average person released with these requirements by the time they reach the end of their prole is at least 20,000 dollars in debt to the state but it can go much higher then that. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 11:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | The punishment part of the Polygraph test for RSO on parole (as a parole requirement) is that they are not free nor is electronic monitoring. The average person released with these requirements by the time they reach the end of their prole is at least 20,000 dollars in debt to the state but it can go much higher then that. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 11:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
:It's not really intended as a punishment, though, even though it's a restriction of liberty. It's intended to rehabilitate and maybe deter. Yeah, the terms of probation usually do require that the defendant pay the costs of his mental health "treatment". If he's indigent, sometimes the state will eat some or all of those costs and not require him to pay the full cost. In my opinion, if the state wants to force pseudoscience on a defendant at the state's own expense, that's bad enough, since it's a waste of the defendant's time and intrudes on his privacy; but it's really shitty to on top of that make him pay for it. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 17:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:01, 29 April 2015
The punishment part of the Polygraph test for RSO on parole (as a parole requirement) is that they are not free nor is electronic monitoring. The average person released with these requirements by the time they reach the end of their prole is at least 20,000 dollars in debt to the state but it can go much higher then that. --Etenne (talk) 11:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's not really intended as a punishment, though, even though it's a restriction of liberty. It's intended to rehabilitate and maybe deter. Yeah, the terms of probation usually do require that the defendant pay the costs of his mental health "treatment". If he's indigent, sometimes the state will eat some or all of those costs and not require him to pay the full cost. In my opinion, if the state wants to force pseudoscience on a defendant at the state's own expense, that's bad enough, since it's a waste of the defendant's time and intrudes on his privacy; but it's really shitty to on top of that make him pay for it. Lysander (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)