Category talk:Boylove: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. ~~~~ |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | ::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | :Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:05, 10 May 2015
I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--Etenne (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many factual errors that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. User4 (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)