Harris Mirkin: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
Removing reference section until the article has references |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Harris Mirkin''' is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Missouri–Kansas City who wrote the controversial 1999 academic article | '''Harris Mirkin''' is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Missouri–Kansas City who wrote the controversial 1999 academic article "[[The Pattern of Sexual Politics]]". | ||
Mirkin calls [[pedophilia]] a Phase I topic, comparing the position of pedophiles in today's society with that of [[homosexuality|homosexuals]] before. Mirkin has been radically misinterpreted by his *friends* as well as his enemies. He did not advocate change. He described reality. | Mirkin calls [[pedophilia]] a Phase I topic, comparing the position of pedophiles in today's society with that of [[homosexuality|homosexuals]] before. Mirkin has been radically misinterpreted by his *friends* as well as his enemies. He did not advocate change. He described reality. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==What is a phase I topic?== | ==What is a phase I topic?== | ||
A phase I topic, by definition, cannot be rationally discussed by society in general. Some within society may be able to do this, it can often be done in academia and by scientists, but, in general, the topic itself is [[taboo]], and the only public expression, outside of academia, that is possible, must be accompanied by what might as well be ritual expressions of horror and disgust, and if you say anything offending the entrenched sensibilities, without that ritual expression, you are a "disgusting pedophile apologist" and may also be attacked. | A phase I topic, by definition, cannot be rationally discussed by society in general. Some within society may be able to do this, it can often be done in academia and by scientists, but, in general, the topic itself is [[taboo]], and the only public expression, outside of academia, that is possible, must be accompanied by what might as well be ritual expressions of horror and disgust, and if you say anything offending the entrenched sensibilities, without that ritual expression, you are a "disgusting pedophile apologist" and may also be attacked. | ||
==Articles== | |||
* "[[The Pattern of Sexual Politics]]" - Mirkin's 1999 article which establishes the a two-phase pattern of sexual politics. | |||
* "[[The Social, Political, and Legal Construction of the Concept of Child Pornography]]" - his 2009 article discussing the flawed dogmas that all production of child pornography causes harm to children and the assumption that images of nude youths can only be viewed erotically. | |||
<!--==References== | <!--==References== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
--> | --> | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* {{cite journal |author=Mirkin, Harris |date= |title=The Pattern of Sexual Politics |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v37n02_01 |pages=1-24 |year=1999 |volume=37 |issue=2 |journal=[[Journal of Homosexuality]] |doi=10.1300/J082v37n02_01 |location= |publisher= | * {{cite journal |author=Mirkin, Harris |date= |title=The Pattern of Sexual Politics |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v37n02_01 |pages=1-24 |year=1999 |volume=37 |issue=2 |journal=[[Journal of Homosexuality]] |doi=10.1300/J082v37n02_01 |location= |publisher=Taylor & Francis Group |accessdate=November 9, 2015 }} | ||
* {{cite journal |author=Mirkin, Harris |date= |title=The Social, Political, and Legal Construction of the Concept of Child Pornography |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918360802623198 |pages=233-267 |year=2009 |volume=56 |issue=2 |journal=[[Journal of Homosexuality]] |doi=10.1080/00918360802623198 |location= |publisher= | * {{cite journal |author=Mirkin, Harris |date= |title=The Social, Political, and Legal Construction of the Concept of Child Pornography |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918360802623198 |pages=233-267 |year=2009 |volume=56 |issue=2 |journal=[[Journal of Homosexuality]] |doi=10.1080/00918360802623198 |location= |publisher=Taylor & Francis Group |accessdate=November 9, 2015 }} | ||
* {{Cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/30/education/30MISS.html |title=Scholar's Pedophilia Essay Stirs Outrage and Revenge |work= New York Times|date=April 30, 2002 |author=Wilgoren, Jodi|archivedate=November 9, 2015 |accessdate=November 9, 2015}} | * {{Cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/30/education/30MISS.html |title=Scholar's Pedophilia Essay Stirs Outrage and Revenge |work= New York Times|date=April 30, 2002 |author=Wilgoren, Jodi|archivedate=November 9, 2015 |accessdate=November 9, 2015}} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mirkin, Harris}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Mirkin, Harris}} | ||
[[Category:United States of America]] | [[Category:United States of America]] | ||
Revision as of 21:13, 9 November 2015
Harris Mirkin is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Missouri–Kansas City who wrote the controversial 1999 academic article "The Pattern of Sexual Politics".
Mirkin calls pedophilia a Phase I topic, comparing the position of pedophiles in today's society with that of homosexuals before. Mirkin has been radically misinterpreted by his *friends* as well as his enemies. He did not advocate change. He described reality.
What is a phase I topic?
A phase I topic, by definition, cannot be rationally discussed by society in general. Some within society may be able to do this, it can often be done in academia and by scientists, but, in general, the topic itself is taboo, and the only public expression, outside of academia, that is possible, must be accompanied by what might as well be ritual expressions of horror and disgust, and if you say anything offending the entrenched sensibilities, without that ritual expression, you are a "disgusting pedophile apologist" and may also be attacked.
Articles
- "The Pattern of Sexual Politics" - Mirkin's 1999 article which establishes the a two-phase pattern of sexual politics.
- "The Social, Political, and Legal Construction of the Concept of Child Pornography" - his 2009 article discussing the flawed dogmas that all production of child pornography causes harm to children and the assumption that images of nude youths can only be viewed erotically.
External links
- Mirkin, Harris (1999). "The Pattern of Sexual Politics". Journal of Homosexuality (Taylor & Francis Group) 37 (2): 1-24. doi:. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v37n02_01. Retrieved on November 9, 2015.
- Mirkin, Harris (2009). "The Social, Political, and Legal Construction of the Concept of Child Pornography". Journal of Homosexuality (Taylor & Francis Group) 56 (2): 233-267. doi:. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918360802623198. Retrieved on November 9, 2015.
- Wilgoren, Jodi. "Scholar's Pedophilia Essay Stirs Outrage and Revenge", New York Times, April 30, 2002. Retrieved on November 9, 2015.
