Category talk:Blocked accounts: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
::Why didn't they just lock the database during the upgrade? That's what $wgReadOnly is for. ~~~~ |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:What do you mean by "indiscriminate"? All accounts were blocked during the upgrade and move. All accounts that had been inactive for several years were not unblocked afterwards. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 18:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | :What do you mean by "indiscriminate"? All accounts were blocked during the upgrade and move. All accounts that had been inactive for several years were not unblocked afterwards. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 18:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::All this information would be fine to have on this category page. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 19:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ::All this information would be fine to have on this category page. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 19:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::Why didn't they just lock the database during the upgrade? That's what [[ | ::Why didn't they just lock the database during the upgrade? That's what [[mediawikiwiki:Manual:$wgReadOnly|$wgReadOnly]] is for. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 22:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:38, 25 November 2015
Isn't there some history of indiscriminate mass blocking of accounts on BoyWiki? I think User4 might know about that. Lysander (talk) 18:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "indiscriminate"? All accounts were blocked during the upgrade and move. All accounts that had been inactive for several years were not unblocked afterwards. --Etenne (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- All this information would be fine to have on this category page. __meco (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Why didn't they just lock the database during the upgrade? That's what $wgReadOnly is for. Lysander (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
