Talk:Interfemoral intercourse (dictionary): Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:OK upon a little further research, I can see that both terms have the exact same definition. I can also see how having both entries as a stand alone entry is needed, as both terms seem useful to know --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 13:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | :OK upon a little further research, I can see that both terms have the exact same definition. I can also see how having both entries as a stand alone entry is needed, as both terms seem useful to know --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 13:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, you are correct. Would ''you'' like to combine them, and put a redirect from one to the other or shall ''I'' (when I have time, of course, so don't hold your breath...) (I believe that intercrural is less common than interfemoral, but I wouldn't bet on it) [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 13:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:31, 21 March 2016
How is this different from Intercrural intercourse (dictionary) and could the two entries be combined? I believe that Intercrural intercourse is the more frequently used term in writings? --Etenne 
13:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- OK upon a little further research, I can see that both terms have the exact same definition. I can also see how having both entries as a stand alone entry is needed, as both terms seem useful to know --Etenne
13:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
