Talk:Interfemoral intercourse (dictionary): Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Off-topic: Do you have a copy of the movie, "[[For a Lost Soldier (film)|For a lost soldier]]"? Can you remember the scene when the boy is on his stomach, and the man is lying on the back of the boy? My copy of the movie is very very low resolution, so details aren't very clear. The question is: Did the boy ''bite'' the finger of the man as the man was doing whatever-he-was-doing with the boy? The real question, of course, is: Was it ''anal'' intercourse, or ''interfemoral'' intercourse? If the boy bit the man's finger, then it would seem to have been the ''former'' and not the ''latter''. What do you think? Can you take a look at the movie and let me know? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 13:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | :::Off-topic: Do you have a copy of the movie, "[[For a Lost Soldier (film)|For a lost soldier]]"? Can you remember the scene when the boy is on his stomach, and the man is lying on the back of the boy? My copy of the movie is very very low resolution, so details aren't very clear. The question is: Did the boy ''bite'' the finger of the man as the man was doing whatever-he-was-doing with the boy? The real question, of course, is: Was it ''anal'' intercourse, or ''interfemoral'' intercourse? If the boy bit the man's finger, then it would seem to have been the ''former'' and not the ''latter''. What do you think? Can you take a look at the movie and let me know? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 13:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::Yes, I remember the scene but I would think you would have to read the [[For a Lost Soldier (book)|book]] to know what the scene depicts? | ::::Yes, I remember the scene but I would think you would have to read the [[For a Lost Soldier (book)|book]] to know what the scene depicts? [[File:Voor een verloren soldaat 63m33s 944x572.jpg|150 px]] | ||
Revision as of 14:00, 21 March 2016
How is this different from Intercrural intercourse (dictionary) and could the two entries be combined? I believe that Intercrural intercourse is the more frequently used term in writings? --Etenne 
13:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- OK upon a little further research, I can see that both terms have the exact same definition. I can also see how having both entries as a stand alone entry is needed, as both terms seem useful to know --Etenne
13:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Off-topic: Do you have a copy of the movie, "For a lost soldier"? Can you remember the scene when the boy is on his stomach, and the man is lying on the back of the boy? My copy of the movie is very very low resolution, so details aren't very clear. The question is: Did the boy bite the finger of the man as the man was doing whatever-he-was-doing with the boy? The real question, of course, is: Was it anal intercourse, or interfemoral intercourse? If the boy bit the man's finger, then it would seem to have been the former and not the latter. What do you think? Can you take a look at the movie and let me know? User4 (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I remember the scene but I would think you would have to read the book to know what the scene depicts?
- Yes, I remember the scene but I would think you would have to read the book to know what the scene depicts?
- Off-topic: Do you have a copy of the movie, "For a lost soldier"? Can you remember the scene when the boy is on his stomach, and the man is lying on the back of the boy? My copy of the movie is very very low resolution, so details aren't very clear. The question is: Did the boy bite the finger of the man as the man was doing whatever-he-was-doing with the boy? The real question, of course, is: Was it anal intercourse, or interfemoral intercourse? If the boy bit the man's finger, then it would seem to have been the former and not the latter. What do you think? Can you take a look at the movie and let me know? User4 (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
