Talk:Interfemoral intercourse (dictionary): Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::::''More'' reading? Don't you think it would be better if I ''finish proofing'' the ''dozens'' of books that are (almost) finished, except for the proofing? For example, Mitzel's "Boston Sex Scandal" just needs 30 more pages of proofing, and it will be done. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | :::::''More'' reading? Don't you think it would be better if I ''finish proofing'' the ''dozens'' of books that are (almost) finished, except for the proofing? For example, Mitzel's "Boston Sex Scandal" just needs 30 more pages of proofing, and it will be done. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::: I am sure that is a wondrous use of your time and well spent. I simple do not know what the scene is meant to actually depict other then the '''love''' physically expressed between these two people. I have no idea if the book goes into any more detail about that either. Plus, I don't speak a work of Dutch (to understand what is said in the film). --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 14:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:16, 21 March 2016
How is this different from Intercrural intercourse (dictionary) and could the two entries be combined? I believe that Intercrural intercourse is the more frequently used term in writings? --Etenne 13:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- OK upon a little further research, I can see that both terms have the exact same definition. I can also see how having both entries as a stand alone entry is needed, as both terms seem useful to know --Etenne 13:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Off-topic: Do you have a copy of the movie, "For a lost soldier"? Can you remember the scene when the boy is on his stomach, and the man is lying on the back of the boy? My copy of the movie is very very low resolution, so details aren't very clear. The question is: Did the boy bite the finger of the man as the man was doing whatever-he-was-doing with the boy? The real question, of course, is: Was it anal intercourse, or interfemoral intercourse? If the boy bit the man's finger, then it would seem to have been the former and not the latter. What do you think? Can you take a look at the movie and let me know? User4 (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- More reading? Don't you think it would be better if I finish proofing the dozens of books that are (almost) finished, except for the proofing? For example, Mitzel's "Boston Sex Scandal" just needs 30 more pages of proofing, and it will be done. User4 (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am sure that is a wondrous use of your time and well spent. I simple do not know what the scene is meant to actually depict other then the love physically expressed between these two people. I have no idea if the book goes into any more detail about that either. Plus, I don't speak a work of Dutch (to understand what is said in the film). --Etenne 14:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- More reading? Don't you think it would be better if I finish proofing the dozens of books that are (almost) finished, except for the proofing? For example, Mitzel's "Boston Sex Scandal" just needs 30 more pages of proofing, and it will be done. User4 (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)