Talk:Tor (The Onion Router): Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Meco (talk | contribs)
User4 (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
::::Carl Sagan is quoted as saying, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." You are making an extraordinary claim. It seems to me that you should provide the evidence. Please do. Thank you. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 03:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
::::Carl Sagan is quoted as saying, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." You are making an extraordinary claim. It seems to me that you should provide the evidence. Please do. Thank you. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 03:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::I kinda don't think the assertion that Tor is unsafe falls into that category, but if you feel like it, go for it! Of course, it's so tiresome doing a couple of Google searches. Anyway, I'm not the one who's going to hurt from applying poor advice from BoyWiki. It's more than twenty years since I published my PGP public key. I even got it signed by Phil Zimmermann. But who cares… __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::I kinda don't think the assertion that Tor is unsafe falls into that category, but if you feel like it, go for it! Of course, it's so tiresome doing a couple of Google searches. Anyway, I'm not the one who's going to hurt from applying poor advice from BoyWiki. It's more than twenty years since I published my PGP public key. I even got it signed by Phil Zimmermann. But who cares… __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::: You use '''''PGP?''''' My god--don't you know about the ''backdoors'' in PGP available to LEO personnel? Google it, you'll see! [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 19:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:00, 23 March 2016

Tor should NOT be promoted

The reports of Tor being compromised by backdoors available to LEO personnel are numerous. The article in its current state does not reflect this at all. ____meco (talk) 07:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Since you say that the reports are so numerous, could you please provide a few links to articles about these "backdoors" in Tor? Thanks. User4 (talk) 07:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
I posted I think 7 or 8 such links in an article on a website that has recently disappeared, so I don't have them readily available for reposting, but you could find several easily by doing a web search. Start with "tor onion backdoor" and try similar terms and variations. __meco (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Carl Sagan is quoted as saying, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." You are making an extraordinary claim. It seems to me that you should provide the evidence. Please do. Thank you. User4 (talk) 03:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
I kinda don't think the assertion that Tor is unsafe falls into that category, but if you feel like it, go for it! Of course, it's so tiresome doing a couple of Google searches. Anyway, I'm not the one who's going to hurt from applying poor advice from BoyWiki. It's more than twenty years since I published my PGP public key. I even got it signed by Phil Zimmermann. But who cares… __meco (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
You use PGP? My god--don't you know about the backdoors in PGP available to LEO personnel? Google it, you'll see! User4 (talk) 19:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)