BoyWiki:Agora/19 April 2016: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
→Literature: new section |
m adding missing date header |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=[[BoyWiki:Agora/19 April 2016|Agora/19 April 2016]]= | |||
== Questions on etiquette regarding editing articles == | == Questions on etiquette regarding editing articles == | ||
Latest revision as of 18:49, 26 April 2016
Agora/19 April 2016
Questions on etiquette regarding editing articles
If another editor creates an article, and has been the only contributor to the article, and I would like to make some changes, or point out what appear to me to be errors in the article:
- would it be better for me to first make comments on the "Talk" page of the article? (This is Wikipedia's [unofficial] policy.)
- would doing so be more respectful to the creator/maintainer of the article?
- and would doing so minimize the possibility of creating problems with other editors?
We're not Wikipedia--we're just a tiny wiki, with only a handful of editors.
It might even be a good idea if all BoyWiki editors followed guidelines similar to those mentioned above, and it could become official BoyWiki policy, couldn't it? What do you think, Etenne?
Literature
literature
- n noun
- 1 written works, especially those regarded as having artistic merit.
- 2 books and writings on a particular subject.
- 3 promotional or advisory leaflets and other material.
ORIGIN
- Middle English (in the sense 'knowledge of books'): via French from Latin litteratura, from littera (see letter).
- repeat:
:2 books and writings on a particular subject.
- repeat:
:2 books and writings on a particular subject.
- repeat:
:2 books and writings on a particular subject.
- repeat:
:2 books and writings on a particular subject.