Talk:Rape rape vs. "rape" rape: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is an personal experience/editorial entry based on personal opinion and does not belong in Category Encyclopedia. [[Help:Encyclopedia|Encyclopedia articles]] are '''factual articles''' written with the goal of preserving knowledge and elucidating ideas pertaining to boylove. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 14:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC) | This is an personal experience/editorial entry based on personal opinion and does not belong in Category Encyclopedia. [[Help:Encyclopedia|Encyclopedia articles]] are '''factual articles''' written with the goal of preserving knowledge and elucidating ideas pertaining to boylove. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 14:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
: | |||
::Uh, I'm kind of confused now... | |||
::For example, if somebody is interested in finding out the strange things about the ''laws'' regarding BoyLove, they are likely to go to the Law category, aren't they? | |||
:::Is the article about the strange things about how the law applies to BoyLovers? Yes, absolutely. So...<nowiki>[[Category:Law]]</nowiki> | |||
::For example, if somebody is interested in finding out about the strange ways that ''psychologists'' view BoyLove, they are likely to go to the Psychology category, aren't they? | |||
:::Is the article about the ''strange ways'' that psychologists view BoyLove? Yes, absolutely. So...<nowiki>[[Category:Psychology]]</nowiki> | |||
::For example, if somebody is interested in ''curious things'' about how BoyLove ''sexuality'' is viewed by society, they are likely to go to the Sexuality category, aren't they? | |||
:::Is the article about BoyLove sexuality? Yes, absolutely. So...<nowiki>[[Category:Sexuality]]</nowiki> | |||
::For example, if somebody is interested in reading about the personal experiences of BoyLovers, they are likely to go to the Personal experiences category, aren't they? | |||
:::Is the article about the ''personal experiences'' of one particular BoyLover? Yes, absolutely. So...<nowiki>[[Category:Personal experiences]]</nowiki> | |||
::But stop a moment, and ask yourself this: If someone is interested in ''strange things'' about the ''laws'' regarding BoyLove, or about how ''psychologists'' view ''BoyLovers,'' or about how ''BoyLover sexuality'' is viewed by ''society,'' they are '''''not''''' likely to go to the Personal experiences category to find those things, are they? Tell the truth--is that category that '''''you''''' would go to, to find those things? | |||
::See, there is ''not'' just ''one correct category'' for each article. There can be ''many correct categories'' for each article. '''''The inclusion of ''categories'' is so that the interests of ''the reader'' are accommodated.''''' It is ''not'' about "putting things in the one right category". Don't you see what I am saying? Haven't you looked at how ''other wikis'' categorize articles? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 18:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:40, 4 May 2016
This is an personal experience/editorial entry based on personal opinion and does not belong in Category Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles are factual articles written with the goal of preserving knowledge and elucidating ideas pertaining to boylove. --Etenne 
14:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Uh, I'm kind of confused now...
- For example, if somebody is interested in finding out the strange things about the laws regarding BoyLove, they are likely to go to the Law category, aren't they?
- Is the article about the strange things about how the law applies to BoyLovers? Yes, absolutely. So...[[Category:Law]]
- For example, if somebody is interested in finding out the strange things about the laws regarding BoyLove, they are likely to go to the Law category, aren't they?
- For example, if somebody is interested in finding out about the strange ways that psychologists view BoyLove, they are likely to go to the Psychology category, aren't they?
- Is the article about the strange ways that psychologists view BoyLove? Yes, absolutely. So...[[Category:Psychology]]
- For example, if somebody is interested in finding out about the strange ways that psychologists view BoyLove, they are likely to go to the Psychology category, aren't they?
- For example, if somebody is interested in curious things about how BoyLove sexuality is viewed by society, they are likely to go to the Sexuality category, aren't they?
- Is the article about BoyLove sexuality? Yes, absolutely. So...[[Category:Sexuality]]
- For example, if somebody is interested in curious things about how BoyLove sexuality is viewed by society, they are likely to go to the Sexuality category, aren't they?
- For example, if somebody is interested in reading about the personal experiences of BoyLovers, they are likely to go to the Personal experiences category, aren't they?
- Is the article about the personal experiences of one particular BoyLover? Yes, absolutely. So...[[Category:Personal experiences]]
- For example, if somebody is interested in reading about the personal experiences of BoyLovers, they are likely to go to the Personal experiences category, aren't they?
- But stop a moment, and ask yourself this: If someone is interested in strange things about the laws regarding BoyLove, or about how psychologists view BoyLovers, or about how BoyLover sexuality is viewed by society, they are not likely to go to the Personal experiences category to find those things, are they? Tell the truth--is that category that you would go to, to find those things?
- See, there is not just one correct category for each article. There can be many correct categories for each article. The inclusion of categories is so that the interests of the reader are accommodated. It is not about "putting things in the one right category". Don't you see what I am saying? Haven't you looked at how other wikis categorize articles? User4 (talk) 18:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
