User talk:FalseAlias: Difference between revisions
→On my opposition to Boywiki: new section |
Edited my statement |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== On my opposition to Boywiki == | == On my opposition to Boywiki == | ||
Okay. Boywiki seems to view child-Adult romantic and sexual feeling as okay to have and seems to imply that if you have these feelings, you should embrace them, rather than teach that these feelings are inappropriate and providing people a way to get help to minimize these feelings with therapy such as Cognitive behavioral therapy. This is the reason why I would like to leave, because I think that is wrong. I am sorry to say this. I just don't think that it's right. I am looking at this website from the point of view of the organization Virtious Pedophiles, and because of this, many of the articles seem to view adult-child romantic relationships as if they are o.k., while Vitruous Pedophiles says | Okay. Boywiki seems to view child-Adult romantic and sexual feeling as okay to have and seems to imply that if you have these feelings, you should embrace them, rather than teach that these feelings are inappropriate and providing people a way to get help to minimize these feelings with therapy such as Cognitive behavioral therapy. This is the reason why I would like to leave, because I think that is wrong. I am sorry to say this. I just don't think that it's right. What I am saying is that the majority of the articles on Boywiki don't say that adult-child romantic and sexual feelings are dangerous to act upon, which can make it harder for some to resist acting on these desires in unlawful ways. Maybe you can take more of a cautious approach, like with a Virtuous Pedophiles stance in mind, which says that acting out on or encouraging others to act out on these desires is wrong, when writing articles. You may disagree with me, but that is just what I think. If you don't agree, then we can agree to disagree and both go our separate ways. Again, I am looking at this website from the point of view of the organization Virtious Pedophiles, and because of this, many of the articles seem to view adult-child romantic relationships as if they are o.k., while Vitruous Pedophiles says that they are not. [[User:Lister34|Lister34]] ([[User talk:Lister34|talk]]) 22:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:03, 16 October 2018
Welcome to BoyWiki!
We hope you will contribute much and well.
You will probably want to read the help pages.
Again, welcome and have fun! Etenne 
20:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
On my opposition to Boywiki
Okay. Boywiki seems to view child-Adult romantic and sexual feeling as okay to have and seems to imply that if you have these feelings, you should embrace them, rather than teach that these feelings are inappropriate and providing people a way to get help to minimize these feelings with therapy such as Cognitive behavioral therapy. This is the reason why I would like to leave, because I think that is wrong. I am sorry to say this. I just don't think that it's right. What I am saying is that the majority of the articles on Boywiki don't say that adult-child romantic and sexual feelings are dangerous to act upon, which can make it harder for some to resist acting on these desires in unlawful ways. Maybe you can take more of a cautious approach, like with a Virtuous Pedophiles stance in mind, which says that acting out on or encouraging others to act out on these desires is wrong, when writing articles. You may disagree with me, but that is just what I think. If you don't agree, then we can agree to disagree and both go our separate ways. Again, I am looking at this website from the point of view of the organization Virtious Pedophiles, and because of this, many of the articles seem to view adult-child romantic relationships as if they are o.k., while Vitruous Pedophiles says that they are not. Lister34 (talk) 22:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
