Market thesis: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Lysander (talk | contribs)
Created page with "The '''market thesis''' is the notion that child pornography consumers increase the market for child pornography production. Deirdre von Dornum writes, "Because child por..."
 
Lysander (talk | contribs)
7
Line 2: Line 2:


[[Deirdre von Dornum]] writes, "Because child pornography is free, widely available and easy to produce, it is not subject to the normal laws of supply and demand."<ref>https://www.nhregister.com/news/article/Debate-rages-over-severity-of-child-porn-sentences-11503089.php</ref><ref>https://www.fd.org/sites/default/files/criminal_defense_topics/essential_topics/sentencing_resources/defender_recommendations/written-statement-of-deirdre-d-von-dornum-at-ussc-2012-public-hrg-on-child-pornography-sentencing.pdf</ref> A 2012 [[U.S. Sentencing Commission]] report found, "Critics have contended that recent changes in Internet technology have undercut the ability of the criminal laws to affect the “market.”"<ref>https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/news/congressional-testimony-and-reports/sex-offense-topics/201212-federal-child-pornography-offenses/Full_Report_to_Congress.pdf</ref>
[[Deirdre von Dornum]] writes, "Because child pornography is free, widely available and easy to produce, it is not subject to the normal laws of supply and demand."<ref>https://www.nhregister.com/news/article/Debate-rages-over-severity-of-child-porn-sentences-11503089.php</ref><ref>https://www.fd.org/sites/default/files/criminal_defense_topics/essential_topics/sentencing_resources/defender_recommendations/written-statement-of-deirdre-d-von-dornum-at-ussc-2012-public-hrg-on-child-pornography-sentencing.pdf</ref> A 2012 [[U.S. Sentencing Commission]] report found, "Critics have contended that recent changes in Internet technology have undercut the ability of the criminal laws to affect the “market.”"<ref>https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/news/congressional-testimony-and-reports/sex-offense-topics/201212-federal-child-pornography-offenses/Full_Report_to_Congress.pdf</ref>
A Senate report on  child  pornography  observed: “the  overwhelming  majority  of  child  pornography  seized  in arrests made in the United States has not been produced or distributed for profit.”<ref>S. Permanent Subcomm. on Investigations of the Comm. on Governmental Affairs, 99th Cong., 2d Sess., Child Pornography and  Pedophilia  47  (Oct.  9,  1986).</ref><ref>https://books.google.com/books?id=vOAvAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA59-PA43&lpg=RA59-PA43&dq=%22the++overwhelming++majority++of++child++pornography++seized++in+arrests+made+in+the+United+States+has+not+been+produced+or+distributed+for+profit%22&source=bl&ots=Wuzhlt06O0&sig=ACfU3U2O0kX6s2f3RVVZtnEEFHlD4vkDqA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjbtPCuv5nqAhXlgXIEHfljDigQ6AEwAHoECAQQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22the%20%20overwhelming%20%20majority%20%20of%20%20child%20%20pornography%20%20seized%20%20in%20arrests%20made%20in%20the%20United%20States%20has%20not%20been%20produced%20or%20distributed%20for%20profit%22&f=false</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 03:23, 24 June 2020

The market thesis is the notion that child pornography consumers increase the market for child pornography production.

Deirdre von Dornum writes, "Because child pornography is free, widely available and easy to produce, it is not subject to the normal laws of supply and demand."[1][2] A 2012 U.S. Sentencing Commission report found, "Critics have contended that recent changes in Internet technology have undercut the ability of the criminal laws to affect the “market.”"[3]

A Senate report on child pornography observed: “the overwhelming majority of child pornography seized in arrests made in the United States has not been produced or distributed for profit.”[4][5]

References