Talk:Childlove Movement

This is a year 2005 copy of a now-deleted Wikipedia article - the URL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childlove_movement

... now redirects to the article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

... within which, much of the material in this article is NOT reproduced.

This article, before being deleted, was being edited by pro- and anti-boylover factions, therefore it contains a curious mish-mash of truth, distortions, and just plain fiction.

It would be very helpful for someone to go back and rebut the distortions and false allegations on a section-by-section basis.

If I only had the time to do it properly... :-(

User4 (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Just do it a little at a time, section by section. Maybe create new articles for each topic, and then aggregate info from other sources into those articles. That's what I did at ChildPorn.info. See the list of articles. For example, "Child_pornography's_potential_to_incite_viewers_to_abuse_children" aggregated info from a bunch of different court cases. Leucosticte (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Step by step, inch by inch (thanks, Moe, for that great line!) Yeah, little by little. Like how life comes to an end... I wonder if I'll make it to this spring...

Oh, BTW -- I have compiled the past (what - 20 years or so?) "talk" pages for the Wikipedia article "Pedophilia" - the talk pages have a lot of useful information, comments, etc. Now - when will I have time to do something with it? Hoo, boy...

I'll check your link. When I have time... Thanks... User4 (talk) 04:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)