Talk:Antisexuals: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
:::You must be thinking of the Shakers. ~~~~ |
re |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
... and a bunch more. You ''should see'' my library... | ... and a bunch more. You ''should see'' my library... | ||
[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 05:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC) | [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 05:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think it's so much a general linkophobia, I think it's just that torrents are automatically viewed as suspect. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 09:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:47, 5 March 2015
There are also some antisexuals who are opposed to all sex, including that between spouses. See http://www.asexuality.org/wiki/index.php?title=Antisexual Leucosticte (talk) 12:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, true. There was a religious group like, too, in the late 19th century (if I remember correctly, the last one died early in the 20th) (short on time, so not googling for their name). They died out for that reason. They refused to breed. And finding converts turned out to be just a wee bit difficult. Gee, I wonder why? User4 (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- You must be thinking of the Shakers. Leucosticte (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, true. There was a religious group like, too, in the late 19th century (if I remember correctly, the last one died early in the 20th) (short on time, so not googling for their name). They died out for that reason. They refused to breed. And finding converts turned out to be just a wee bit difficult. Gee, I wonder why? User4 (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Anyway, I just wanted to get a "quickie" article in on the topic, and didn't bother to go into great detail. The antisexuals and the sexophobes are our real enemies -- it is due to their efforts that BLs have been demonized in society (as has happened with other "sexual orientations" in the past, too. There's a great book about that -- ).
- Gee, I'd love to link you to a whole bunch or materials, but seems we suffer here from "linkophobia" these days. Funny, most other sites post links (they just don't host the actual materials) and don't have any problems at all. If you look at the torrent sites, they put a disclaimer that the links are legal, but they do not host the materials on their own servers, so it is completely legal. But it seems that BW is different...
- I'd like to link you to a study called: Historic origins of penal statutes concerning sexual activities involving children and adolescents, by Martin Killias (the original .PDF was titled: martin_killias_1.pdf ) but I don't think that I should. Hmm... I often use the google search: "inurl:SEARCH TERM " to find good stuff. Another interesting book that I wish I could give you a link to is:
- Sexology collection. Sex in the Ancient World from A - Z , originally titled: 0415242525.pdf , but I don't think I should.
And another (don't have the original .PDF file name,)
- The rise and fall of 20th century sexual psychopath laws.pdf
Then there's
- Policing Sexuality- Sex, Society and the State.pdf,
then there's (this is the original title)
- Hagay-Frey - Sex and Gender Crimes in the New International Law; Past, Present, Future (2011).pdf .
- Gayle S. Rubin Deviations A Gayle Rubin Reader a John Hope Franklin Center Book 2011.pdf
- Pseudoscience- A Critical Encyclopedia, Brian Regal (original title: 031335507XPseudoscience.pdf
- Sex Panic and the Punitive State.pdf (for this, try site:boychat.org )
- SEX AT DAWN THE PREHISTORIC ORIGINS OF MODERN SEXUALITY(sex_at_dawn-prehistoric_origins.pdf maybe original title)
- Sex and Punishment_ Four Thousand Years - Eric Berkowitz.mobi (original title)
... and a bunch more. You should see my library... User4 (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think it's so much a general linkophobia, I think it's just that torrents are automatically viewed as suspect. Leucosticte (talk) 09:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC)