User:Lysander/Orphan issues: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Lysander (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lysander (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
These are issues that no one seems to be organizing to deal with.
These are issues that no one seems to be organizing to deal with.


*'''Legalizing child porn possession and distribution:''' There is no organization I know of that is devoted to advocating for this reform or that devotes any significant attention to it. The [[ACLU]] declines to specifically advocate criminalization of child porn possession and distribution, but stops short of advocating its decriminalization.
*'''Legalizing child porn possession and distribution:''' There is no organization I know of that is devoted to advocating for this reform or that devotes any significant attention to it.
*'''Legalizing child porn production by children under 13:''' Basically it's assumed that prepubescent children are asexual and wouldn't produce child porn unless influenced to do so by adults. (Is there any truth to this? Perhaps there could be indirect influence, in which children influenced by adults in turn influence other children.)
*'''Legalizing child porn production by children under 13:''' Basically it's assumed that prepubescent children are asexual and wouldn't produce child porn unless influenced to do so by adults. (Is there any truth to this? Perhaps there could be indirect influence, in which children influenced by adults in turn influence other children.)
*'''Giving children under the age of 13 the same rights as adults:''' The idea is sometimes mentioned in highly theoretical articles written by libertarians, but no one is actually trying to implement this. Groups like the [[National Youth Rights Association]] only care about teenagers.
*'''Giving children under the age of 13 the same rights as adults:''' The idea is sometimes mentioned in highly theoretical articles written by libertarians, but no one is actually trying to implement this. Groups like the [[National Youth Rights Association]] only care about teenagers.

Revision as of 17:31, 7 March 2015

These are issues that no one seems to be organizing to deal with.

  • Legalizing child porn possession and distribution: There is no organization I know of that is devoted to advocating for this reform or that devotes any significant attention to it.
  • Legalizing child porn production by children under 13: Basically it's assumed that prepubescent children are asexual and wouldn't produce child porn unless influenced to do so by adults. (Is there any truth to this? Perhaps there could be indirect influence, in which children influenced by adults in turn influence other children.)
  • Giving children under the age of 13 the same rights as adults: The idea is sometimes mentioned in highly theoretical articles written by libertarians, but no one is actually trying to implement this. Groups like the National Youth Rights Association only care about teenagers.
  • Defending the rights of incarcerated sex offenders to receive mailings that defend childlove and advocate for decriminalization of adult-child sex:
  • Defending the rights of convicted sex offenders on supervised release to possess pornography: It doesn't seem to bother anyone that these guys can't even do something as normal and harmless as flip through a Playboy when they're whacking off without risking going back to prison.
  • Defending the rights of convicted sex offenders on supervised release to use computers without being monitored: Basically every aspect of these guys' online lives is subject to government surveillance, and no one cares. Their ability to advocate for their own freedom is greatly hindered.
  • Defending the rights of convicted sex offenders on supervised release to associate with felons: This makes it hard to participate in organizations like RSOL that may have other convicted felony sex offenders, or to keep up a correspondence that would support the morale of incarcerated convicted felony sex offenders, but no one seems to care.
  • Defending the rights of convicted felony sex offenders to possess firearms: With all the vigilantes out there who knows where these guys live, maybe their safety could be improved by being allowed to possess firearms, but no one seems to care.