Extraterritorial jurisdiction: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
Created page with "'''Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ)''' is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries. Child sex tourism by U.S. nationals has ..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ)''' is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries. [[Child sex tourism]] by U.S. nationals has been subject to extraterritorial jurisdiction since the [[PROTECT Act of 2003]]. One cited justification for this has been that destination countries have inadequate laws or resources to prosecute child sex tourists. Those who seek to stop child sex tourism would generally prefer that the destination countries prosecute the offenses, to eliminate the need for witnesses and forensic evidence to travel long distances and lessen the bureaucratic steps and communication complications involved. | '''Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ)''' is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries. [[Child sex tourism]] by U.S. nationals has been subject to extraterritorial jurisdiction since the [[PROTECT Act of 2003]]. One cited justification for this has been that destination countries have inadequate laws or resources to prosecute child sex tourists. Those who seek to stop child sex tourism would generally prefer that the destination countries prosecute the offenses, to eliminate the need for witnesses and forensic evidence to travel long distances and lessen the bureaucratic steps and communication complications involved.<ref>{{cite journal|title=International Child Sex Tourism: Enhancing the Legal Response in South East Asia|author=Johnson, Afrooz Kaviani|journal=The International journal of children's rights|date=03/2011|volume=19|number=1|pages=55-79}}</ref> | ||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
Revision as of 06:20, 9 March 2015
Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries. Child sex tourism by U.S. nationals has been subject to extraterritorial jurisdiction since the PROTECT Act of 2003. One cited justification for this has been that destination countries have inadequate laws or resources to prosecute child sex tourists. Those who seek to stop child sex tourism would generally prefer that the destination countries prosecute the offenses, to eliminate the need for witnesses and forensic evidence to travel long distances and lessen the bureaucratic steps and communication complications involved.[1]
References
- ↑ Johnson, Afrooz Kaviani (03/2011). "International Child Sex Tourism: Enhancing the Legal Response in South East Asia". The International journal of children's rights 19 (1): 55-79.
