Talk:Encyclopedia of Homosexuality: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:: I believe that each time I excerpt something, I give give a URL, as in "The source for the above: xxx.xxx.xxx Isn't that sufficient? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 17:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | :: I believe that each time I excerpt something, I give give a URL, as in "The source for the above: xxx.xxx.xxx Isn't that sufficient? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 17:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:: Several of the sections are preceded by the following statement: "The following material is taken from the Encyclopedia:" [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 17:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:02, 9 March 2015
Hi.
There are at least two places the Encyclopedia of Homosexuality may be accessed on the Internet:
http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Encyclopedia_of_Homosexuality (.PDF files of the encyclopedia, divided into sections.) and http://www.sexarchive.info/BIB/EOH/ The second site claims to be authorized to reproduce it on-line. The contents of the materials on both sites are identical - they were both prepared from the exact same page scans from the encyclopedia (so the .HTML at sexarchive.info is the same as the text that you can copy from the williampercy .PDF version). I have already personally confirmed that this is true. Oh, and the articles on Pederasty and Pedophilia are excellent.
User4 (talk) 19:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- I added some citation tags... if you can tell me where you got this info, I will add the references. --Etenne (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- I believe that each time I excerpt something, I give give a URL, as in "The source for the above: xxx.xxx.xxx Isn't that sufficient? User4 (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Several of the sections are preceded by the following statement: "The following material is taken from the Encyclopedia:" User4 (talk) 17:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
