United States v. Whorley: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''United States v. Whorley''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''United States v. Whorley''}}{{Law icon}} | ||
'''''[[United States v. Whorley]]''''' was a case, decided 18 December 2008, in which the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]] rejected the defendant's arguments "that cartoons depicting minors in sexually explicit conduct must depict real-life minors to violate" {{uscsub|18|1466A|a|1}}. Bryan Kim-Butler writes, "What is perhaps most striking about Whorley is not how the majority deals with the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|first amendment]] issues at stake, but rather how those issues are evaded."<ref>{{cite journal|title=Fiction, Culture and Pedophilia: Fantasy and the First Amendment after ''United States v. Whorley''|author=Kim-Butler, Bryan|date=13 May 2011|url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2184350|volume=34|number=3|pages=545|journal=Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts}}</ref> | '''''[[United States v. Whorley]]''''' was a case, decided 18 December 2008, in which the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]] rejected the defendant's arguments "that cartoons depicting minors in sexually explicit conduct must depict real-life minors to violate" {{uscsub|18|1466A|a|1}}. Bryan Kim-Butler writes, "What is perhaps most striking about Whorley is not how the majority deals with the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|first amendment]] issues at stake, but rather how those issues are evaded."<ref>{{cite journal|title=Fiction, Culture and Pedophilia: Fantasy and the First Amendment after ''United States v. Whorley''|author=Kim-Butler, Bryan|date=13 May 2011|url=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2184350|volume=34|number=3|pages=545|journal=Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts}}</ref> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:Child pornography]] | [[Category:Child pornography]] | ||
[[Category:Law]] | [[Category:Law/case law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:57, 13 April 2015
United States v. Whorley was a case, decided 18 December 2008, in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit rejected the defendant's arguments "that cartoons depicting minors in sexually explicit conduct must depict real-life minors to violate" . Bryan Kim-Butler writes, "What is perhaps most striking about Whorley is not how the majority deals with the first amendment issues at stake, but rather how those issues are evaded."[1]
References
- ↑ Kim-Butler, Bryan (13 May 2011). "Fiction, Culture and Pedophilia: Fantasy and the First Amendment after United States v. Whorley". Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 34 (3): 545. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2184350.
External link
- United States v. Whorley, 550 F.3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008).
- Stanley, Lawrence A. (12 May 2009). Down the Slippery Slope - The Crime of Viewing Manga. ComiPress.
