Civil rights and boylove: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{draft}}
A '''civil right''' is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury and which ensure one's ability to participate in the civil and political life of the society and state without discrimination or repression.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights  Civil and political rights (Wikipedia)]</ref> The phrase "civil rights" is a translation of Latin ''ius civis'' (rights of a citizen). Roman citizens could be either free (''libertas'') or servile (''servitus''), but they all had rights in law.<ref>Mears, T. Lambert, ''Analysis of M. Ortolan's Institutes of Justinian, Including the History and'', p. 75.</ref>
A '''civil right''' is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury and which ensure one's ability to participate in the civil and political life of the society and state without discrimination or repression.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights  Civil and political rights (Wikipedia)]</ref> The phrase "civil rights" is a translation of Latin ''ius civis'' (rights of a citizen). Roman citizens could be either free (''libertas'') or servile (''servitus''), but they all had rights in law.<ref>Mears, T. Lambert, ''Analysis of M. Ortolan's Institutes of Justinian, Including the History and'', p. 75.</ref>



Revision as of 12:56, 19 May 2015

A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury and which ensure one's ability to participate in the civil and political life of the society and state without discrimination or repression.[1] The phrase "civil rights" is a translation of Latin ius civis (rights of a citizen). Roman citizens could be either free (libertas) or servile (servitus), but they all had rights in law.[2]

Boylove civil rights issues

"It's about having laws that are reasonable, and which punish transgression only as severely as similar non-sexual transgressions are punished. It's about non-discrimination based on a perception of ones sexual interests. It's about the freedom to enlighten the public without retaliation, so that they may make informed decisions on such matters. It's about not being sexually profiled and entrapped because you bought an art book or a DVD the government disapproves of." [3]


  1. Human rights.
  2. Abolition of the Sex offender registry.


References

  1. Civil and political rights (Wikipedia)
  2. Mears, T. Lambert, Analysis of M. Ortolan's Institutes of Justinian, Including the History and, p. 75.
  3. They Use the Term 'Pro-Contact' as a Weapon