Talk:BLogo: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Meco (talk | contribs)
→‎My critique: new section
 
Meco (talk | contribs)
→‎My critique: discussion at BoyChat
Line 1: Line 1:
==My critique==
==My critique==
Not about the article, but the symbol. I don't think it has any great symbolic power. I mean, the use of a triangle isn't even discussed in any authentic fashin! This looks like just another meaningless branding symbol churned out by any old advertising company! I think the 'Mb' of the original NAMBLA logo is awesome though. I really take to that one. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Not about the article, but the symbol. I don't think it has any great symbolic power. I mean, the use of a triangle isn't even discussed in any authentic fashion! This looks like just another meaningless branding symbol churned out by any old advertising company! I think the 'Mb' of the original NAMBLA logo is awesome though. I really take to that one. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
:I made [http://boychat.org/messages/1460764.htm a post] at BoyChat referencing this critique. It engendered some heated discussion, though so far not really addressing my objections. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 15:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:04, 21 November 2015

My critique

Not about the article, but the symbol. I don't think it has any great symbolic power. I mean, the use of a triangle isn't even discussed in any authentic fashion! This looks like just another meaningless branding symbol churned out by any old advertising company! I think the 'Mb' of the original NAMBLA logo is awesome though. I really take to that one. __meco (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

I made a post at BoyChat referencing this critique. It engendered some heated discussion, though so far not really addressing my objections. __meco (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)