Talk:Betrayal of trust: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This article needs some ''very serious'' reworking. It is amazing that BoyWiki allows articles which are so poorly written to remain in mainspace. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 05:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC) | This article needs some ''very serious'' reworking. It is amazing that BoyWiki allows articles which are so poorly written to remain in mainspace. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 05:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
:1. If you have an issue with an article please add the appropriate page tag. 2. You Wrote it. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 12:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC) | :1. If you have an issue with an article please add the appropriate page tag. 2. You Wrote it. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 12:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
: | |||
::Hmm... perhaps you notice that I have been a little bit busy creating/editing articles over the past 24 hours? If you look at the "Recent changes" page, perhaps you will see what I mean... I was up all night, working on all these articles. I happened on the Betrayal of trust article, noticed it was poorly done, and left that comment. (I was ''very'' tired at that point.) It seems clear why the article is such a mess--I cut and pasted from several sources, then included other information, but never went back to fix it (I went offline not long after I started the article, remember?.) Because it is so poorly done, I assumed that you-know-who did it, so I left that comment. My bad... [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 15:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:08, 11 April 2016
Cleanup required
This article needs some very serious reworking. It is amazing that BoyWiki allows articles which are so poorly written to remain in mainspace. User4 (talk) 05:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- 1. If you have an issue with an article please add the appropriate page tag. 2. You Wrote it. --Etenne
12:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC) -
- Hmm... perhaps you notice that I have been a little bit busy creating/editing articles over the past 24 hours? If you look at the "Recent changes" page, perhaps you will see what I mean... I was up all night, working on all these articles. I happened on the Betrayal of trust article, noticed it was poorly done, and left that comment. (I was very tired at that point.) It seems clear why the article is such a mess--I cut and pasted from several sources, then included other information, but never went back to fix it (I went offline not long after I started the article, remember?.) Because it is so poorly done, I assumed that you-know-who did it, so I left that comment. My bad... User4 (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
