Template talk:Disputed: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


Could you possibly create one? Thanks. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Could you possibly create one? Thanks. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
:Yes I could possibly make a template like that but I need you to explain further what would be the usefulness of that? When a curator tags a page, it is on the page in question adding <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> [[{{PAGENAME}}]] is not a big problem but seems redundant.
:Yes I could possibly make a template like that but I need you to explain further what would be the usefulness of that? When a curator tags a page, it is on the page in question adding <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> [[{{PAGENAME}}]] is not a big problem but seems redundant.--[[Etenne]]  [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 15:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:04, 25 April 2016

I have been meaning to ask that a template for articles containing disputed claims be created (not only for articles in the Encyclopedia category). I tried to create such a template myself, but failed.

I would like to have a template similar to the one you created here, but which provides a link to an "[article name] Disputed" article, where comments may be made to argue or dispute the comments found in the original article.

Could you possibly create one? Thanks. User4 (talk) 14:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes I could possibly make a template like that but I need you to explain further what would be the usefulness of that? When a curator tags a page, it is on the page in question adding {{PAGENAME}} Disputed is not a big problem but seems redundant.--Etenne 15:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)