Talk:Wes Anderson: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
Thomasmann (talk | contribs) |
Thomasmann (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: Hmm... so here's the conundrum we face: You-know-who's won't out themselves. The media lies and distortions are not countered in the major media. Until gays "came out" in large numbers, there was no "gay liberation movement." We allow ourselves to be tyrannized by a small number of ''very vocal'' nutcases. And so [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_love_that_dare_not_speak_its_name "the love that dare not speak its name"] remains silent. Have you read [[America's War on Sex]] yet? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 18:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | :: Hmm... so here's the conundrum we face: You-know-who's won't out themselves. The media lies and distortions are not countered in the major media. Until gays "came out" in large numbers, there was no "gay liberation movement." We allow ourselves to be tyrannized by a small number of ''very vocal'' nutcases. And so [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_love_that_dare_not_speak_its_name "the love that dare not speak its name"] remains silent. Have you read [[America's War on Sex]] yet? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 18:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::"Until gays "came out" in large numbers, there was no gay liberation movement." Says the guy posting under the name [[User:User4|User4]] lol. I'll check the book out. | :::"Until gays "came out" in large numbers, there was no gay liberation movement." Says the guy posting under the name [[User:User4|User4]] lol. I'll check the book out. [[User:Thomasmann|Thomasmann]] ([[User talk:Thomasmann|talk]]) 20:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 2 May 2016
Speculating if someone who has not come out as a BL can be a dangerous and potentially libelous. Plus, I feel strongly that we should not engage in that. Is there a way you can reword the intro to that section to make it a little less inflammatory and make it focus more on that the man enjoys working with boys etc.. and has many boys in his films and let people draw their own conclusion for that? BTW, thanks for all you work. As I am sure User4 will tell you, I am not a big "thank you' kind of guy" or a flatterer.. just know that your efforts are appreciated. --Etenne 
12:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I will find a way to rework it without the speculation. Thomasmann (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
"This has led to speculation regarding his sexual orientation."
That is a true, but not a damning, statement. Perhaps that could be included somewhere? User4 (talk) 17:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- User4, I think in order to say something like that, Etenne would want the speculation to be from some kind of mainstream newspaper or something. It's ok I think. I just revised the article completely leaving out any speculation or my own thoughts. It's just the facts posted there now. And you don't have to be a genius to see what the facts indicate here. This guy is without a doubt, a 100% and complete _________. Personally, I hope we never can verify it through news media because the only reason that'd be in the news is if he got in trouble for something. He's one of my very favorite directors. I want him to stay safe and making excellent movies with cute boys for the rest of my days. Thomasmann (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
-
- Hmm... so here's the conundrum we face: You-know-who's won't out themselves. The media lies and distortions are not countered in the major media. Until gays "came out" in large numbers, there was no "gay liberation movement." We allow ourselves to be tyrannized by a small number of very vocal nutcases. And so "the love that dare not speak its name" remains silent. Have you read America's War on Sex yet? User4 (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- "Until gays "came out" in large numbers, there was no gay liberation movement." Says the guy posting under the name User4 lol. I'll check the book out. Thomasmann (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
