Talk:John Geoghan: Difference between revisions
Thomasmann (talk | contribs) respond to User4 |
Thomasmann (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
(You have to "read between the lines" in these articles, as they are highly biased by the "victimologists") [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC) | (You have to "read between the lines" in these articles, as they are highly biased by the "victimologists") [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:You're absolutely right. | :You're absolutely right. [https://anonfiles.com/file/3d118bf2d838f9efebac389c574a1918 Here's a link to download]a peer reviewed study that came out called '''Differentiating Pedophilia from Ephebophilia in Cleric Offenders.''' Definitely worth reading. "One of the most significant findings from the survey was that the majority of victims were older boys. Survey results showed that 7,174 or 70% of the victims of cleric sexual abuse were boys ages 11 through 17 (John Jay College, 2004)." | ||
:These "pedo priests" were mostly just gay men who liked twinks. [[User:Thomasmann|Thomasmann]] ([[User talk:Thomasmann|talk]]) 15:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC) | :These "pedo priests" were mostly just gay men who liked twinks. [[User:Thomasmann|Thomasmann]] ([[User talk:Thomasmann|talk]]) 15:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 8 May 2016
Wikipedia:
- He was found guilty in January 2002 of indecent assault and battery for grabbing the buttocks of a 10-year-old boy in a swimming pool at the Waltham Boys and Girls Club in 1991, and was sentenced to nine to ten years in prison.
- "grabbing the buttocks"? What kind of "crime" is that? Incredible! Playing the (familiar) game of "grab ass" will send someone to prison?
Most of the (so-called) "priest child molesters" actually had sex with boys who were of legal age to do so. The claims of "molestation" are bogus. Note that rarely are the ages of the boys mentioned--the reason for this is to hide the fact that the priests did not violate any laws! A report was issued demonstrating that most of the so-called "molestation" was consensual, legal, homosexual sex. The report can be downloaded here. www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/child-and-youth-protection/upload/The-Nature-and-Scope-of-Sexual-Abuse-of-Minors-by-Catholic-Priests-and-Deacons-in-the-United-States-1950-2002.pdf
An article (one of many such) can be found here: http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/priestly-sex-abuse-would-not-have-happened-without-homosexuals
If you want more information, google "report archdiocese homosexual priests" (without the quotation marks) or ask me. User4 (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
See also:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_Roman_Catholic_priests
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jay_Report
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_scandal
(You have to "read between the lines" in these articles, as they are highly biased by the "victimologists") User4 (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right. Here's a link to downloada peer reviewed study that came out called Differentiating Pedophilia from Ephebophilia in Cleric Offenders. Definitely worth reading. "One of the most significant findings from the survey was that the majority of victims were older boys. Survey results showed that 7,174 or 70% of the victims of cleric sexual abuse were boys ages 11 through 17 (John Jay College, 2004)."
- These "pedo priests" were mostly just gay men who liked twinks. Thomasmann (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
