Category talk:Dictionary
This category is very nice. Just one click, and then there is a lot of content to choose from.
Not like other categories which, when you click on them, are empty except for containing one more category, which then is empty, too, except for containing one MORE category, which, when you click on that one contains only one page in it!
People want content, they don't want practice clicking their mouse on something but then being disappointed when they find there is nothing there!
If that happens too often, then they stop bothering to click on anything, because they don't want to be disappointed again by finding nothing there!
And if that happens, then it doesn't matter if you put content in the category tomorrow, or next month, or next year because they are not going to bother to click on it! You have already lost them and they won't trust you any more!
- Yes and no, I agree for right now it's OK as it is but I anticipate in the future that it will get much larger and need to be divided up. As BoyWiki is a specialized wiki, many things that are not relevent to boylove but are needed as a reference or require further definition will be added to category dictionary --Etenne (talk) 14:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- We could copy Wiktionary's scheme. See e.g. wiktionary:Category:en:Pedophilia. Lysander (talk) 22:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
