Talk:Underwear

"some jurisdictions would frown on pictures that focused preferentially on the genital area"

Not just frown on them. In the U.S. they can send you to prison for those pictures. User4 (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

@‎Wanker

You need to be a bit more careful to what you link to and post... entries like this give the impression of impropriety. Even though some would say this site is x-rated, we need to keep it PG-13. --Etenne (talk) 23:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

I removed the links to TU as I felt very uncomfortable with linking to that site in this context. While that site maybe perfectly legal, linking it here could make trouble for them. --Etenne (talk) 01:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

I recommend reverting the removal. A solution to potential censorship issues is to create backups and prepare to set up a mirror in a friendlier jurisdiction. We must preserve the culture, and TU is part of the culture. Lysander (talk) 04:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure lets do that... after we register the domain name under your identity and add a disclaimer that you are responsible for the content of BoyWiki. --Etenne (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

If that happened, then User4 would probably immediately leave, the others would probably leave shortly thereafter, and the wiki would go the way of ChildWiki. Lysander (talk) 16:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)