Talk:Freedom of speech

There's actually quite a lot of other speech that's prohibited, besides the nine categories listed here. For example, baking a wedding cake for a gay couple is arguably a form of speech (especially if it has some saying on it like "Congratulations"), but the government will compel a baker to bake it.

So then, why not also compel them to bake a cake for little Adolf Hitler Campbell? Oh, because the public doesn't like that kind of speech, but they like pro-LGBT speech.

We're living in an era that's decidedly unfriendly toward dissident speech, and it's probably going to get worse, if the attitudes of today's college students are any indication. They're all about having "safe spaces" where they can be protected from speech that makes them uncomfortable.

Come to think of it, the anti-child porn laws are, at this point, largely an effort to create a "safe space" for victims where they can feel secure that they'll never run into a person who has viewed child porn of them. For this reason, I think people like Gregory Hoffman are pretty cool, because they deliberately try to thwart that goal and awaken victims to the reality that child porn is actually awesome. Lysander (talk) 10:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

This entry would be better if it included information about how Boylovers freedom of speech is being limited for example laws prohibiting the "propagation Pedophilia content" (ref. French Criminal code - Art 227-22 / 227-23 / 227-24 and 321-1) i,e, laws to prevent political discourse that protect no one. etc... --Etenne 12:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)