Talk:Spain, July, 2015: age of consent raised from 13 to 16

There is an entry on Spain. Why shouldn't this be a subsection of that entry? It is so specific that it can not be made into a stand alone entry IMHO. --Etenne (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

This is a major development. Spain had been a long-time "hold-out," against the feminazis, and has had a more reasonable AOC of 13 (and until a few years ago, the AOC was 12).

Because of the importance of this major change in Spanish law, I feel that a separate entry is warranted. BoyLovers who live in/travel to Spain must immediately be made aware that Spain is no longer "tolerant" of BoyLovers, and has changed to law to reflect this.

Yes -- this should be added to the Spain article (feel free to do so) but a separate entry is justified, at least for the next couple of years, until the news gets out that the new AOC is 16. User4 (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

My thought is that if it is just going to remain how it is now, then it should simply be a subsection of Spain. However if someone wanted to put in the time and effort of researching the history that lead up to this law, who the major players were in promoting this decision, who sponsored the law, etc, etc..... then it would warrant being an entry on it's own. --Etenne (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

addendum .... and what role the US government or US NGO's played in putting pressure on the Spanish government to enact this law.--Etenne (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Seems that I forgot to put {{stub}}, didn't I? ;) User4 (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

It seems to me that a link to this article should go on the Main Page as important breaking news

https://www.boywiki.org/en/Spain,_July,_2015:_age_of_consent_raised_from_13_to_16

It might save some BoyLovers from going to prison. User4 (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

It is simply not complete enough or cleaned up enough to qualify as a feature article for BoyWiki's main page. However if you wish to put the work into making this a proper entry. I would certainly include it but it would have to improve significantly. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria for an idea of what is needed. --Etenne (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Forget it. Sorry I brought it up. I'll just go ahead and blank the page, or you can delete it. It's better if BoyWiki does nothing, and just lets several dozen -- or more -- BoyLovers go to prison in Spain. Who cares? You don't seem to. User4 (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Nor do you apparently since you don't seem to feel this is an important enough subject to present correctly or put any effort into. --Etenne (talk) 16:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your concept of the "presenting correctly" of an article -- an article which is simply the announcement of a new law that potentially puts in danger thousands of BoyLovers -- leaves very much to be desired. If you cannot understand that, then there is nothing that I can do to help you. User4 (talk) 16:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)